Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter Sarnoi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Sarnoi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX. PRehse (talk) 11:14, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Boxing-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 11:15, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment PRehse (talk · contribs). Latino title handed out by the World Boxing Organization wouldn't qualify as notable? As I read NBOX, a WBO titlist is notable....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:21, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WilliamJE Competeting for a world title sure and there is also a list of regional titles were winning can infer notability. But in this case the Latino WBO title is too minor to be on that list (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Boxing/Title Assessment).PRehse (talk) 17:32, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know about that title assessment page. Therefore I say Delete per WP:NBOX....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete The "interim Latino Silver" title is not enough to meet WP:NBOX and the coverage is typical sports reporting.Sandals1 (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC) Looks like a duck to me.[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.