Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wai Thu La Pyae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wai Thu La Pyae

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable student actor, no major roles and no in depth coverage in any language. CUPIDICAE💕 16:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per nom. I did a quick search in my language and can't see any way that this can pass WP:GNG. Phoela14 (talk) 17:22, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Myanmar-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt - this has to be almost a borderline WP:A7; there's no credible claim of significance here, unless I'm missing something. Does not meet WP:NACTOR, WP:BASIC etc. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not opposed to a speedy deletion, I just wanted a final nail in the coffin since they've repeatedly created it. It's bordering on a hoax, actually. CUPIDICAE💕 18:24, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing that it's a vanity article judging by the fact that the user has no interest in editing outside of this article and is doing their absolute best to disrupt this discussion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With all of that in mind, I have requested salting Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. // Timothy :: talk 18:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per all above. I have read the only reference and it is about a completely different person, with no mention of this article's creator. pinktoebeans ^(talk) 22:01, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No claim to notability is made here. As Pinktoebeans indicates, the only reference cited is about a completely different person. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Current sources doesn't indicate WP:GNG. Akronowner (talk) 05:52, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked sock. MER-C 12:55, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per all about. There is no such Burmese actor with that name. Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 09:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just because someone "wants to be a famous artist" does not mean they are notable. It is articles like this that make me 100% sure we need to make creating articles more difficult.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:59, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Personally I think we need to make all new articles go through AfC. However, I think we need to change our perameters so that users cannot create new articles in their first 50 edits.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am not sure that we could call this a "hoax". It is an article written it seems by a high school senior in Myanmar who has a very weak grasp of the English language about himself. As best I can tell, he is involved in band at his school, and may or may not have been involved in school theatrical productions. It is unclear what he means by wanting to be an "artist", since in some circles this word is actually used instead of musician. Beyond that his only other claim seems to be that he went and visited multiple places in Myanmar, and he created what apparently is meant to be a list of specific places that he visited.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Another copy-paste article is incubating in draft namespace as Draft:Thu La Pyae. Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 17:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Per Praxidicae's nom rationale. Furthermore, yes I agree with Johnpacklambert, I believe a mechanism should be developed to that effect & although it is quixotic of me to say this, but I also want a time to come whereby all articles are mandated to pass through the AFC process, theoretically speaking, that would be a very daunting task if it were to happen but I feel that would eliminate UPE & the creation of non notable articles. Celestina007 (talk) 18:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. If the closing admin would be so kind as to ping me, the associated Wikidata item was nominated for deletion but can't be deleted while the article still exists here. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Failure of GNG, BIO and NACTOR. Java Hurricane 14:03, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Clearly not notable. This page is being repeatedly recreated, if possible please salt it. Ashley yoursmile! 07:24, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Don't think this is relevant. VocalIndia (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete :) — Alalch Emis (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.