Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UnCommon Web
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 15:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- UnCommon Web (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT. Few passing mentions in Google Scholar and other sources, no in-depth coverage. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 11:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 11:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete – no significant independent coverage. DferDaisy (talk) 16:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references - only ref provided is of an email exchange. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 10:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.