Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SymbioNode

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 00:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SymbioNode

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable type of "data carrier". — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Hue Sat Lum 00:28, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - This should be merged into Delay-tolerant networking or deleted since it is part of that topic. Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:38, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 14:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -Scottywong | communicate _ 16:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Should not be merged as there is no content supported by reliable sources to be merged. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Absolutely no independent coverage found at Google or Google News Archive. (It's always a bad sign when the top Google hit is the Wikipedia article!) --MelanieN (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Insufficient reliable source coverage to meet WP:GNG. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.