Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swaffling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swaffling

Doesn't seem to be notable, but being the Dutch Word of the Year may count for something. HeureusementIci (talk) 23:16, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--I assure you, no one asked me for my favorite word. I do note that the only English reference for a translation of a Dutch term is urbandictionary--and that we don't accept as a reference. The word is a translated neologism, and its meaning and scope is trivial. Perhaps it's the word of the year in the Netherlands now, but it won't be for long, and if some insensitive idiot wants to swing his dick against the Taj Mahal, who cares? Drmies (talk) 01:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Already covered in the Dutch wiktionary (which is where a word of the year should be). Since the whole thing was never officially translated and the win was based a single news event, I don't see how an article could be developed from this. The word of 2007 was Bokitoproof which is no longer in wide use, so this one too is unlikely to have lasting notability. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:29, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Does it exist on the English Wiktionary under Dutch words? 76.66.195.159 (talk) 05:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete People swaffle, but so far there was no name for it. There's an article on things like fellatio as well, which might as well be declared unimportant and flagged for deletion if swaffling doesn't qualify. With the media exposure regarding the topic, the election to word of the year and the picking up of the english neologism by some urban dictionaries, I think the existance of a wiki article on it is justified. - User:Naggiepoo|^(talk) 15:05, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Happy ^Holidays 02:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Neologism. ChildofMidnight (talk) 08:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not English. Colonel Warden (talk) 09:22, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.