Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scripts & Scruples

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, non-notable, previously deleted as spam. Admin closure. Dreadstar † 18:07, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts & Scruples and associated pages

Scripts & Scruples (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Non-notable podcast with single editor POV and contributes, all original research, no citations noted other than podcast home page. AfD should also include the following pages. Manhattan (Scripts & Scruples); Template:Scripts & Scruples; Gregory Walker (S&S); John Paul Hunter; Blake Whitney; Adriana Cummings; Connie Richards; and Rockland County (Soap Opera). All created to "support" the main article. IrishLass0128 13:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:WEB. Really bizarre article about a podcast that doesn't actually mention that it's a podcast at all: indeed someone just reading through might assume it's a TV or radio show of some kind. Presumably this is to escape deletion as I'm sure podcast categories are regularly pruned by editors experienced in their nature. In any case, has all the problems one might expect: no reliable sourcing, no claims of notability, etc. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IS BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soapfan91 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- See? Even the creator wants it deleted. He's calling it bullshit. --UsaSatsui 15:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, per WP:WEB, and quite honestly the comments by Soapfan91. A podcast soap doesn't meet notability and doesn't fit per the WP:WEB guidelines. Speedy delete would be my recommendation. CelticGreen 02:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. If the show is only a podcast, than I'm not even sure the show is notable enough to be on Wikipedia, let alone a character... ≈Alessandro ♫^{T • C} 02:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you guys are assholes!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soapfan91 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -it is increasingly clear that this person is only putting the articles up for their own benefit based on the comments above. Urging strong delete at this juncture. IrishLass0128 12:53, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, clearly not notable at this time. But what do I know, I'm an asshole. --UsaSatsui 15:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That must make me the leader or the biggest asshole since I nominated this article. That's okay, no offense taken. Question, how long does this process generally take? IrishLass0128 17:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.