Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Lyman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Making big deals is not among our inclusion criteria, see W:N. Sandstein 12:35, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Lyman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable real estate broker. Bradv 17:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:19, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Ron has made multi-million dollar deals with notable corporations such as Foxwoods, CVS, Big Y, and other notable corporations as outlined in his Wikipedia page. User talk:CTWealth 23:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Should this be moved to speedy delete? Page is clearly copied from subject's website [1]. Korossyl (talk) 05:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't be deleted as he has made multi-million dollar transactions with corporations such as Foxwoods Resort Casino, CVS Pharmacy, Rite Aid, Sherwin-Williams, Taco Bell, Dollar Tree, and more notable Fortune 500 companies. When asked one of his employees, they said it was alright to copy some as done while at the same time, information was added not found on the website. [2]. User talk:CTWealth 07:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.189.63.253 (talk) [reply]
Delete as entirely damned as an advertisement with clear attempts and refusals to not change it as such, the comments above as it is only state "But he's worked with other companies and he's known for it!" or "His company clearly shows he worked with major companies" but that means nothing if it only exists as advertising, hence that's what matters, and why deletion solves it. SwisterTwister talk 01:12, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.