Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RegexBuddy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- RegexBuddy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relies on only two primary sources and could not find WP:SIGCOV for the article Teancum (talk) 16:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. North America1000 16:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Unable to find any significant coverage from reliable sources about this software. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. pinktoebeans (talk) 21:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. Alternativeto is crowdsourced, not RS, and in any case only has a few sentences about RegexBuddy, not in-depth coverage. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 14:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.