Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenSpace3D

OpenSpace3D

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm having a difficult time finding sufficient in-depth coverage from independent sources to meet WP:GNG. This is not, however, my area of expertise, so I would appreciate help in locating such sources, as much of it looks promotional. JTtheOG (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Products, Software, and France. JTtheOG (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Found this, unfortunately that is all I could find and it still doesn't pass GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 02:49, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yesterday, I nominated what people found “a lot” of articles for deletion in a “short space of time”. They were extremely short and obviously non-notable. Today, this user seemingly entered my page and chose to nominate this article in apparent retaliation, which I translated from Spanish Wikipedia. Do whatever you want, I don't care, I just wanted to stress the correlation of events for you to judge the behavior of this editor. Aldorwyn of Rivendell (talk) 07:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Whether it's retaliation or not, it doesn't mean pages that you personally create can get a "free pass" from passing notability standards. If it was a spurious nomination and you could easily counter it with presented sources, you'd have more of a leg to stand on here. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:03, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would be fascinated to hear how English MPs and Supreme Courts Presidents are "obviously non-notable". This fundamental misunderstanding of Wiki policies most certainly warrants further scrutiny of your past edits. JTtheOG (talk) 08:19, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So my “misunderstanding” warrants further scrutiny on this article just because I happened to have created it, and you thought reverting my yesterday tags and nominating this for deletion would “teach my a lesson”?, great. And that's not retaliation? Ok, delete it if it makes you happy and keep self promo articles of 3 lines about a defunct magazine of 70 years ago in “your” Wikipedia, I just don't care. Aldorwyn of Rivendell (talk) 10:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
BTW you are incurring in Wikipedia:Harassment#Hounding Aldorwyn of Rivendell (talk) 10:33, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As it reads there: "Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight." Aldorwyn of Rivendell (talk) 10:34, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:IQUIT is a heavily discouraged argument on AfD discussions. Keep it focused on the facts of whether sources exist rather than stoking irrelevant drama to distract from the issue at hand. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:35, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't quit, and I don't care, just do whatever you want. You just chose to undo all my prods yesterday and to keep this one in pushback and retaliation and you are ganging on me due to personal differences, not this article quality or the quality of the other articles. That's your behaviour. Good luck. You can ban me if you want. Aldorwyn of Rivendell (talk) 11:47, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bring that to ANI if the behaviour bothers you, this isn't the venue for it. Oaktree b (talk) 13:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No coverage found about this game engine. In French websites I can only find social media or university mentions of it [1]. Sourcing now in the article is primary or in non-RS. Oaktree b (talk) 13:45, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]