Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megan Skiendiel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify‎. ✗plicit 11:27, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Megan Skiendiel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed WP:GNG, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER. There is no significant independent coverage establishing individual notability where most available sources are derivative of group notability, focus on her only in the context of Katseye, and provide only routine and/or trivial information. She hasn't released solo recordings or had solo chart success and there are no critical reviews of her vocal or songwriting outside of the group. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:20, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Korea, South Korea, and United States of America. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:22, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Drafity, none of her acting credits are notable enough to have any references about them beyond listing them off, which basically leaves some trivia about her as a member of Katseye. For now the article can be draftified and returned to once her career is more established. orangesclub 🍊 09:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Move back to draft space — Cactoideae♫♪ (talk) 15:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Television, and Hawaii. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:52, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - Not ready for mainspace right now. Segaton (talk) 11:10, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify is appropriate here. Bearian (talk) 00:42, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - Not yet ready but doesn't need to delete it. Abskiee (talk)
draftify, and redirect to Katseye: nominator is correct. there is no significant coverage of the subject as an individual. Most of the coverage available (in reliable sources) is of the band/group, and not of the subject itself - failing general notability criteria. Given the lack of personal music releases, subject also fails notability criteria for individual singers. I dont have crystal ball either, but I dont think the subject will become notable in next 7 months, so it is recommended to redirect the title to Katseye. Whenever the subject becomes notable, the draft can be moved back. —usernamekiran (talk) 09:54, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.