Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 05:15, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Magic rock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MOVIES jsfouche ☽☾ talk 04:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 04:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As said above - unnotable. Keep. Schmidt brought up a good point. Endofskull (talk) 04:25, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative Keep and continue improvements. The New York Times devoted a rather lengthy article to the film in July of 2001.[1] Let's see what else we can find. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:37, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Film with respectable ratings. The article will join the vast number of other film articles on WP. scope_creep (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.