Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lydia Morton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lydia Morton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails WP:BIO for lack of third party coverage. Only primary sources provided LibStar (talk) 01:48, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless references to significant coverage by reliable, independent sources are provided. The two press releases used as references are inadequate to establish notability. Cullen328 (talk) 03:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 09:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 05:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The current references in the article don't prove notability, nor did a quick google search. Unless notability and WP:SIGCOV can be proven, the subject isn't worthy of a wikipedia article. - GA Melbourne (talk) 13:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. From my search Ambassador Morton was a well-mentioned diplomat, however the coverage was about the activities she took part in. Not so much about herself. Open to change my mind if good sources are found. gidonb (talk) 14:28, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.