Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz Gallacher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Needs some work, though. Tone 15:54, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Gallacher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Unreferenced bio about a non-notable person. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:50, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sufficient career achievement to merit inclusion. A little more bio and a little less puff would be desirable. Carrite (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep User:Carrite has it correctly, in that the individual has a lengthy career,[1][2] and the article and the project will benefit from cleanup and sourcing. Asserting in a nomination that someone is "non-notable" simply because the article lacks use of the many available sources,[3] would be indicative of it needing improvement through regular editing, and not deletion... and for an award-nominated individual who makes a decent dent in WP:CREATIVE, deletion is a last resort. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:01, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.