Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kime bag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 04:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kime bag

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I initially PROD'd this as an unreferenced non-notable product. The original entries only links were to sites where you could purchase the item which remains more a gimick than anything else - google hits basically reflect this.Peter Rehse (talk) 11:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced article about a product with no supported claims of notability. Mere existence is not enough to show notability. Papaursa (talk) 00:12, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources or indication of notability.Mdtemp (talk) 15:38, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.