Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JuffEd
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:51, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- JuffEd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NSOFT. Can't find any reliable, significant coverage beyond this Softpedia review. Softpedia reviews practically everything, and this review mostly just lists features rather than being in-depth. I didn't PROD it because some editors asserted notability on the talk page in 2008. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete Not seeing anything. (I've checked Newspapers.com, Gale Research, and Archive.org). Timur9008 (talk) 08:07, March 12, 2025 (UTC)
- Delete never anything substantial on this page 190.219.102.63 (talk) 02:54, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.