Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jools Siviter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Spooks. As nobody's actually said where to merge it to, I presume everyone is happy with Spooks Ged UK 13:17, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jools Siviter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about a non-notable character who appeared for an extremely short space of time (just one episode?) ╟─Treasury Tag►sundries─╢ 19:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Google Scholar link above actually has one hit, but without supporting text, so I can't tell if it's a notable mention. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:53, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It says: In the same episode a conflict between MI5 and MI6 emerges in which the latter is represented by the arrogant upper class Jools Siviter (Hugh Laurie). He is shown as a Wagner-loving power addict, always far more cynical, ruthless and devious than the MI5 agents in the way he controls and then sacrifices his agents. This helps to emphasize the relative ordinariness of the MI5 agents compared with the inner workings of elite sections of the state. ╟─Treasury Tag►Not-content─╢ 22:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks. Still thinking about it. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:49, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Yes, this was the shortest lived and first MI-6 contact on the show... but hey, it was also Hugh Laurie, hence there's a bit more out there about him. No need for a separate article, can be covered adequately in a list article. Jclemens (talk) 23:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A bit more about him? What bit more about him, may I enquire? :) ╟─Treasury Tag►Not-content─╢ 23:23, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
By the "bit more about him" I was comparing him to other one-appearance characters, who generally do not merit inclusion in lists of characters. Had it been a less famous actor, I would not expect a single appearance to be a reason for inclusion on a character list. Jclemens (talk) 04:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge would support deletion due to a lack of references that can WP:verify notability. But supporting merge in hopes of building a consensus. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.