Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JohnnyBoyXo
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- JohnnyBoyXo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced, non-notable "internet sensation". Nakon 05:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't know if the recent edtis by the IP are vandalism or not, but s/he removed alot of unreliable sources, fails notability of a person and recently is an unsourced BLP. TbhotchTalk C. 05:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:23, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Despite her numerous youtube productions, these themselves look to fail WP:N so the individual fails WP:ENT. Did find ONE mention of her in an article. And while she is quite active on the social forums, such activity does not equate to notability. Biggest issue, is that while the body of youtube work might itsellf be confirmed to the works themselves, there are no independent sources speaking aboutthe individual that could be used to source the article. This may well change in the future... but at the moment, I don't find it. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 11:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Delete I don't know anything about adding comments to Wikipedia, nor much about JohnnyBoyXo. In fact I only came across her for her video for the "It Gets Better" campaign, where it's currently in the top 5 videos alongside John Berry, Justin Bieber and Pixar. This suggests to me that the article is worth keeping, even if it would benefit from a rewrite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.216.19 (talk) 07:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.