Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In memory data grid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In memory data grid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, simply the definition/examples of what this software product is -- perhaps move to Wiktionary and redirect? Theo polisme 11:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In-memory data grids are a new, emerging breed of products that will start to supersede and/or complement the traditional RDBMS. Examples of IMDG include Oracle Coherence, VMWare Gemfire and Hazelcast. There are wiki entries for these products. I plan to cite sources to provide evidence for the features outlined in the article. It may take me a few weeks to complete all the references. P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulcolmer (talk • contribs) 11:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "a new, emerging breed of products" is unlikely to be notable - see WP:TOOSOON. --Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:35, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure original research, obviously based on creator's own paper. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete OR, or maybe a coatrack to link the company. At best, a theory without sources or peer review. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 19:50, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback so far. Have added some links to help with Notability. Links to Gartner who is an independent research firm and also SearchSOA. Let me know if this address the concerns, or whether further referencing is required. P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulcolmer (talk • contribs) 04:00, 28 September 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.