Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Win (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to My Island. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Win

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable and non-notable EP Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 10:54, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy keep~~ - nominator does not make a valid argument for deletion. "Unremarkable" is not a policy-based deletion rationaile. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not notable. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 10:53, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's better, but "It's not notable", without further explantion, is considered an argument to avoid. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 15:20, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to My Island, the album. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 15:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.