Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freesexuality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Freesexuality

Neologism + original research = deletion. CalendarWatcher (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--esp. the OR tendencies of this article go too far. References given are to things and concepts that underlie the term that is the subject of the article, not to the subject itself. Drmies (talk) 02:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — per nom. Unremarkable neologism. roux 02:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete concur with nom. JJL (talk) 03:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: When the reference from the definition is from Urban Dictionary, you are dealing with a neologism. Tavix (talk) 04:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:OR and WP:NEO Matt (Talk) 05:44, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete oddly, I have the impression that the other really believes in this, and considers it notable. But the point is that very few people care about the odd opinions on sexuality some few have. Pstanton 07:49, 28 December 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
Merge into Free love which covers many such ideas. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NEO.Oroso (talk) 08:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:NOR. NoVomit (talk) 10:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is all covered by free love and pansexuality. Rob T Firefly (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Merge to Free Love per above. This might be going the way of WP:SNOW CaveatLector ^{Talk Contrib} 20:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —CaveatLector ^{Talk Contrib} 20:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to pansexuality, which shares the same definition, but is more widely used and has a better article. --Alynna (talk) 21:33, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.