Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feel++

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feel++

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established. GScholar turns up a conference paper that got cited a few times and a few uncited ones. The GitHub repo has not been forked and only starred six times, so I suspect this library has very few users. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment GBooks does turn up a hit, so maybe I was too quick. I'm not allowed to browse that hit, but the snippet suggests Feel++ was previously known as Life. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The project was previously host on subversion then on google code, and now on Github for less than one year. I think the number of star is irrelevant, it doesn't represent the number of users and even not the number of developers (~19 active). This library is involved in several european research projects (High field magnets, vesicles, blood flow simulation, [2][3]...) and for example got 60 000 000 core hours on HPC for 6th Prace call [1]. This project is still actively developed and publish papers after 8 years of existence.

-- (talk) 18:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found no notability per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 01:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, additionally the detail provided on the subject is extremely limited. ~Frosty (Talk page) 01:57, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.