Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DynStats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:13, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DynStats

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant Advertising Creeperparty568 ~ Cool Guy (talk) 12:31, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Its an obvious WP:PROMO article. The product is not even released, its a "demo" at version 0.32. It fails WP:NSOFTWARE/WP:PRODUCT/WP:WEB in all criteria. There is 0 coverage of this webtool - not even by non-reliable sources anywhere and it therefore fails WP:GNG very hard too. The article has been created by User:Niuman Comas. "N Comas" can be found as "author" in the dynstats homepage, so its probably self promotion. Dead Mary (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:15, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete They're basically using the wikipedia as a company website, they don't seem to have a landing page of their own and the website solicits "donations" for non-free software (which they mislabeled as Free Software). I'm going to correct that in the name of Our Glorious Prophet and Savior Richard Stallman. Jergling (talk) 16:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I flagged it for notability and lack of references hoping that it might spur somebody to produce evidence of notability. Patently not. It's an advert pure and simple. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:32, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all been said above, no secondary source so fails GNG. Widefox; talk 22:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note creator had an undisclosed WP:COI. An WP:SPA account EXT spamming WP:NOTHERE. Widefox; talk 22:28, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.