Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Datacube Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Datacube Inc.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has very little references, and not much information about the company can be found on Google search. AKK700 02:03, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Computing, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sounds like WP:PROMO, could not verify the sources used and little information on Google Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:05, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found significant coverage about the company in EDN, Electronic Engineering Times, Vision Systems Design, Electronics, and more. Currently trying to cite the article while culling all the plucky original research. DigitalIceAge (talk) 07:10, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Found even more non-routine, independent feature coverage in some trades and books. Every sentence has now been cited and almost all of the cruft has been culled. DigitalIceAge (talk) 03:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep After article improvement, notability seems to be firmly established. Well done! Pavlor (talk) 05:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.