Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Banguel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Thanks everyone who contributed to the discussion. If you are not happy with the decision, please bring it up here. Missvain (talk) 14:48, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Banguel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Quasi-promotional WP:BLP of a public speaker, resting almost entirely on primary sources. Although there are a couple of reliable sources here, every one of them is covering him specifically in the context of an unsuccessful candidacy for election to his local school board — which isn't a role that would satisfy WP:NPOL even if he'd won the election. Which means that the article isn't making or sourcing a proper claim of notability that would make him a keepable topic, because neither primary sources nor coverage of an unsuccessful campaign for a non-notable office count for anything toward meeting WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable.--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:54, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He is an unnotable public speaker who lost in the election to a school board. Even if he had won he would almost certainly not be notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:19, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The best my searches found were some results here. Nothing to suggest better notability or improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.