Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Huard
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
- Dan Huard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable personality fails WP:N; subject requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Sources provided in article do not meet WP:GNG, and others aren't present in Google News. -- Wikipedical (talk) 03:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete/redirect. I used to watch Screen Savers. Loved that show and DH, just not here. — Wyliepedia 16:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.