Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daigle Me
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted as G3, no proof it exists Versageek 13:42, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Daigle Me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage anywhere that I can find. Does not meet WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 04:08, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. - Non notable film. Absolutely no sources. No proof that it even exists. --Kudpung (talk) 04:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a not notable film. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 05:12, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources, no notability, very short article anyway. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 15:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can find no proof that this film exists. Joe Chill (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a probable hoax since no sources can be found. Heiro 04:18, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as WP:HOAX. Mike Allen 05:06, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If actually shot in September (ahem), and with no coverage, the kindest thing that might be said is this article is too soon... but with complete lack of verifiability, WP:HOAX looks to apply. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:14, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment since User:Versageek deleted the article[1] while its AFD was still in process,[2] I have asked that he also consider closing this AFD as now moot.[3] I do not think anyone will question either his good faith deletion or an early close to this open AFD. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.