Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrafterCMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:29, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CrafterCMS

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Source analysis:

cmswire (Ref 1) - WP:TRADES
ArgonDigital - paid marketing article
Business-Software.com - ROTM vendor listing
MarTech Series (ref 4, 8, 11)- again marketing material
CMS Critic (ref 5, 9) - press release
Lighter Capital - investment round
devcontentops - routine primary source
The Gilbane Advisor - newshark release, paid article
CrafterCMS.org - website
github - database entry Changgok Do-Hyeon (talk) 03:48, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Changgok Do-Hyeon's review of the references makes a case for deletion, because the company doesn't pass the notability criteria. Zalaraz (talk) 04:53, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, Software, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as patroller. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 18:30, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per fail of WP:NCORP and this source analysis. Iljhgtn (talk) 02:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.