Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brody emerson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brody emerson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor with only one very minor role to his credit, in a film that hasn't even been released yet. May become notable someday, but not yet. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. One role as "Best Friend" in a movie that hasn't been released and doesn't have an article of its own yet does not establish notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:17, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as waaaaaaay TOOSOON. Brody emerson has only one unnamed credit.[1] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:59, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following comment was copied from this page's talk page -- I believe the article's author intended to weigh in on the discussion:

My client is a new up an comer. He is already featured on IMDB.COM, If they think he is notable already then I would think it should be okay on the site to. He is already ranked 149,601, out of millions in the world. He also has other movies that are in post production but none have been given the green light yet. So until that time all Brody has is this one movie that has 5 big stars in. It may be a small role but its STILL a role and he has made a name for himself in Hollywood. He is also recognized already to ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by APATALENTJS (talk • contribs)

Comment If Emerson is your client, your page amounts to promotion, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Also, it is generally noted that if one has to use the phrase "up and coming" in relation to a subject, that subject is not yet notable enough for an article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WikiDance61 is correct. The manager/agent of the subject is exhibiting conflict of interest (COI). It appears to me that the author is either the subject himself or a close associate - COI again. And by the way, IMDB does not screen actors for notability, they provide cast and crew lists for film and television. Being listed as a cast member on one project does not, in and of itself, make said cast member sufficiently notable for these pages. The article is very poorly put together, with no references or citation to back up claim of notability.Evalpor (talk) 16:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I went into the article and straightened it up, just to show good intentions and to make this discussion a bit easier. I added two IMDB links, corrected some spelling, and reformatted. At least now editors can now see, at a glance, what's what. Evalpor (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not yet notable. (Also the article's creator couldn't even get the capital letters right in the title, which really gets my goat... grrr.) Bazonka (talk) 08:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.