Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BOSS Flow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:13, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BOSS Flow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article cites no third party sources, so I believe it does not meet the general notability guideline and should be deleted. I initially placed a PROD tag on this noting that, but it was removed by the article poster with the edit summary 'Remove 'deletion' tag, external links and verifiable information have been added.' Unfortunately, all of those links were written by the software's author, as were all of the other links I could turn up in my own reference searches. MrOllie (talk) 19:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. StuartDouglas (talk) 12:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the project BOSS Flow is just about 9 moths old and it is mostly used in Czech Republic, so discussions and texts should be currently available just in Czech language, even the page and all project documentation is in English that's used as the international language. I guess it will be a short time until it is possible to find new references to verify the content, even though I'm not sure if it is right now despite Wikipedia policy that is a hard reason for deletion immediately or not. MartinStrejc (talk) 13:15, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless reliable sources pop up, per WP:TOOSOON. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.