Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autofac (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Autofac (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not finding any news, and only blogs and the like. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 19:28, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—I'm seeing several passing mentions in the dependency injection literature, but nothing of sufficient heft that would allow an article to be written. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 09:46, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 14:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above - I'm unable to locate sufficient coverage to demonstrate that this topic meets WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT at this time. Gongshow talk 15:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.