Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Gupta (American Politician)

Ajay Gupta (American Politician)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

American politician, unelected to office. Standing in March 2026, this is WP:TOOSOON and the subject does not otherwise pass WP:GNG. Article is promotional, which can be fixed, but absent notability deletion is the solution. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and United States of America. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Law, India, California, Connecticut, Georgia (U.S. state), Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:56, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete WP:NOTRESUME - This is being used as a campaign announcement. Does not appear to have otherwise served in an elected office. — Maile (talk) 11:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article does not pass WP:GNG. RealStanger43286 (Let's talk!) 14:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Very PROMO. Does not meet political notability, the career is routine otherwise. I don't see how this could be made notable, this is basically a CV in disguise. Oaktree b (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the promo stance, and per WP:NOTRESUME x2step (lets talk 💌) 18:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:NOTRESUME and WP:PROMO. No reliable sourcing indicates this person meets GNG. MidnightMayhem (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:POLITICIAN and the GNG, going away. Ravenswing 21:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - run of the mill attorney and political candidate. Absolutely fails my usual standards. The four policies are also typical of every other Republican; if he were, for example, in favor of releasing the Epstein files, or for a Federal sales tax, then that might be notable. Bearian (talk) 02:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN and is WP:MILL. Jcgaylor (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Failing on WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Iljhgtn (talk) 04:41, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At the most inclusionist interpretation of whether a candidate should have an article, a candidate is best viewed as a participant as in a big event. It is too soon to know if he will be a notable participant in the event. For example, the petition deadline for ballot access for major parties is not until this upcoming Monday. What if he does not file? As of this comment he has not done so. I think even if he files, it would still be a violation of WP:CRYSTAL because of how many such candidates simply never meet any sort of notability criteria.--Mpen320 (talk) 13:45, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; Does not meet WP:NPOL and WP:GNG, appears to be astroturfing ✝ barbieapologist (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We are in WP:SNOWBALL territory and probably ready to close. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 23:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]