Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Active Camouflage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect. Woohookitty 09:47, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Stub for a minor Halo power-up. I would be bold and redirect this to Active camouflage, but I didn't want to start a revert war. -- Grev -- Talk 20:04, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Halo, Redirect per nominator — Lomn | Talk / RfC 20:29:11, 2005-08-25 (UTC)
- M&R per nom. Alf 20:39, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge content to [Halo]] and redirect to Active camouflage because of capitalization. - Mgm|(talk) 21:35, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Merge and Redirect per nominee. I have the itch to be bold but don't want to be zapped for violating WP:DP. Alba 22:29, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, not important enough to be merged with Halo, please, think of the users. Kappa 22:39, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Kappa, I don't get what you mean here. I play Halo and Halo 2, and I don't see anything wrong with a merge and redirect here. Talk to me, hoss. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:14, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Providing this level of detail on a main page clutters it up too much for generaly users. Kappa 23:25, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand your concern, but the existing paragraph on active camouflage is almost as long as this article already; it'd be a tiny merge at mostt. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:35, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Kappa, I don't get what you mean here. I play Halo and Halo 2, and I don't see anything wrong with a merge and redirect here. Talk to me, hoss. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:14, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Active camouflage, Merge any Halo information not already in Halo: Combat Evolved and Halo 2 into their respective articles. Not a notable enough videogame powerup to merit its own article. Not sure any videogame powerup outside of Super Mario Bros is notable enough for its own article, actually. :) Fernando Rizo T/C 23:35, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There isn't a single videogame powerup ever that deserves its own article. Adding three lines to a main page (as that's all that would be needed) is not cluttering. Merge all info, leave a redirect to Active camouflage. Having Active Camouflage and Active camouflage go to different articles is far more confusing for general users - Kappa, surely you can see that? Proto t c 09:55, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.