Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/010 Editor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

010 Editor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 03:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 08:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can find significant coverage for this software and have added some citations to the article. Colonel Warden (talk) 06:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - despite refs found by Colonel Warden - it is just a hex editor and not relay notable. Codf1977 (talk) 11:20, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't think the sources constitute significant coverage. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Significant coverage" means more than passing mention. Badger Drink (talk) 04:31, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NSOFT. Not notable. SnottyWong talk 23:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Click the Google news link at the top of the AFD. GUI Program News is a notable news source, which others then archive news items from, and even sell access to the articles. It dedicated an article to the 010 Editor. Seems like very notable coverage to me. Dream Focus 04:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question Dream Focus, are you basing this on having read the article in it's entirety? The preview in front of the paywall at highbeam looks like a press release to me, and in trying to track down the publication itself, I keep landing in market oriented pages. I work in IT and I've never heard of GUI Program News.... --Nuujinn (talk) 11:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

delete proving existence does not prove notability... need some sources that actually explain what the heck this is and verify it... Arskwad (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- There's lots of software in the world and most of it can be verified to exist. But most software in the world is not notable, and this isn't. Reyk _YO! 06:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.