User talk:Yogiin

August 2025

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Deviprasad Dwivedi, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:OVERLINK. CodeTalker (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Yogiin (talk) 09:13, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Department of Sports, Government of Bihar, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:26, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for taking the time to review the article. I believe I have addressed the issue you mentioned, so the tag may now be removed. Please let me know if any further improvements are needed Yogiin (talk) 05:53, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marvin Emnes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 14:14, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @GiantSnowman for bringing this to my attention. I apologize if my edits appeared unconstructive — that was not my intention. I will review the guidelines more carefully and ensure my contributions are accurate and verifiable. I appreciate your feedback and will use the sandbox for testing in the future Yogiin (talk) 04:10, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moved draft

Hi, can you please tell me why you moved Draft:Dimpal Singh from drafts into the main article space? It is very poorly referenced and provides no evidence of notability, and was declined at AfC accordingly. You also have had no involvement with this draft, your only contribution was to publish it past AfC – why? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:49, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article currently uses weak sources,but a Google search shows sufficient coverage in reliable, independent sources. Adding these will improve references and establish notability. Yogiin (talk) 17:04, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gyan Bharti Public School moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Gyan Bharti Public School. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:33, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have declared a COI in this subject, therefore you should not have moved the draft unilaterally into the main article space, but should instead put it through the AfC review process – especially when there is very little evidence that the subject is actually notable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

appreciate Yogiin (talk) 02:45, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gyan Bharti Public School (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gyan Bharti Public School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yogiin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

surely thanks Yogiin (talk) 13:39, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sportdata moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sportdata. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and most sources are currently primary and cannot be used to demonstrate notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. sk satsuma 16:36, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Sksatsuma Yogiin (talk) 17:10, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gyan Bharti Public School (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gyan Bharti Public School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 05:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bihar State Sports Authority (BSSA)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Yogiin (talk) 15:30, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Follow this (organisation), you may be blocked from editing. You have been asked before to edit according to WP:OVERLINK. In addition, the Dutch Republic ended in 1795. Drmies (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Drmies,

Thank you for pointing this out. I apologize if my edits caused any disruption. I understand your concern regarding WP:OVERLINK and historical accuracy, and I will be more careful going forward. I appreciate your guidance, and I’ll make sure to follow the relevant policies and seek consensus on the article’s talk page if there are any further content questions.

Best regards,

@Yogiin Yogiin (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you will edit in accordance with what the chat bot wrote. Drmies (talk) 13:50, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adarsh Anand for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adarsh Anand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adarsh Anand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thilsebatti (talk) 04:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The subject meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline as there are multiple reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage. For example:

[Source 1: https://news24online.com/entertainment/who-is-adarsh-anand-woman-accuses-youtuber-of-physical-assault-and-threats/531202]

[Source 2: https://www.etvbharat.com/hi/!entertainment/bhagalpur-social-media-influencer-and-mimicry-artist-adarsh-anand-unique-story-hindi-news-brn25073105406]

[Source 3: https://www.abplive.com/states/bihar/bihar-bhagalpur-adarsh-anand-met-with-pm-narendra-modi-he-shared-his-experience-2921923]

These demonstrate that Adarsh Anand has received coverage beyond routine mentions. The article can be further improved with references to strengthen it. Yogiin (talk) 10:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Karate in Bihar

Hi, Yogiin. I've moved the article you created Karate in Bihar to draftspace; I can see that you generated much of it with a large language model (colloquially known as a 'chatbot' or 'AI'), which has produced many issues - the most obvious one is that half the references don't exist! That interferes with our ability to verify facts, make sure the article is neutral. I've moved it to draftspace to be rewritten. I think it would be a good idea for you to submit it through the articles for creation process, once you've worked on the issues I've identified. GreenLipstickLesbian 💌🦋 19:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article and for moving it to draftspace. I appreciate your feedback and understand the concerns regarding the use of sources and verifiability. I will work on improving the draft by replacing or removing unreliable references and ensuring that all content is properly sourced and written in a neutral tone before resubmitting it through the Articles for Creation process. Thank you again for your guidance. Yogiin (talk) 11:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]