User talk:RolandR/Archive 14
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:RolandR. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | → | Archive 18 |
The Signpost: 24 April 2016
- News and notes: Lunar project; steering group formed to search for next executive director
Maybe the rover could find an ED on the moon...
- Op-ed: Knowledge Engine and the Wales–Heilman emails
When is competing with Google not competing with Google?
- Special report: Update on EranBot, our new copyright violation detection bot
Help wanted!
- Traffic report: Two for the price of one
What's better than one traffic report? Two!
- Featured content: The double-sized edition
10 articles, 6 lists, and 11 pictures have been promoted in this cycle
- Arbitration report: Amendments made to the Race and intelligence case
When it rains, it pours
Translation help please.
Hey, you say you are a translator from Hebrew to English. Could you please translate this phrase:
הודעה בדבר בצגת רשימות הבוחרים לכנסת לשנת פנקס החוברים ה'תשמ"ו/ה'תשמ"ז - 1986-1987
If it will help you, I need it for a [trans-title] for a citation. Here is the source it self: [1].
Thanks.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Announcement about presentation of the lists of electors for the Knesset for Electoral Register year 5746-7 (1986-7). RolandR (talk) 15:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Blessings--Bolter21 (talk to me) 15:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Bolter is seventeen Roland. It puts a few things into context. If you still want help Bolter, I am willing to assist. Mentoring will help. You have calmed a lot. Sorry for the interruption Roland. Cheers, Simon. Irondome (talk) 15:40, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Blessings--Bolter21 (talk to me) 15:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
- News and notes: Wikimedia Switzerland's board and paid-editing firm; passing of Ed Dravecky
Wikimedia Switzerland board members involved in paid-editing firm
- In the media: Wikipedia Zero piracy in Bangladesh; bureaucracy; chilling effects; too few cooks; translation gaps
More reports surface of pirates' new favorite database: Wikimedia Commons
- Traffic report: Purple
Prince's death breaks traffic report records
- Featured content: The best ... from the past two weeks
Seven articles, six lists, and four pictures were promoted these weeks
- Arbitration report: Two editors unbanned; Wikicology case enters workshop phase; Gamaliel restricted from Gamergate at his own request
Arbitration news
- Recent research: The eight roles of Wikipedians; do edit histories expose social relations among editors?
Making sense of Wikipedia's social network

It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
- Ping. Please respond if you're still interested. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- I have responded. Had a computer problem, and needed to replace my hard disk and reinstall software; now almost fully functional again. RolandR (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 June 2016
- News and notes: WMF cuts budget for 2016-17 as scope tightens
The Signpost analyzes the WMF's revised annual plan
- In the media: Jimmy Wales on net neutrality—"It's complicated"—and his $100m fundraising challenge
Recent press interviews
- Featured content: Overwhelmed ... by pictures
One article, one list, and seven images were featured this week
- Traffic report: Pop goes the culture, again.
Film and television maintain a strong grasp on Wikipedia's readership
- Arbitration report: ArbCom case "Gamaliel and others" concludes
The final results of the heated case
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video Games
We sat down with the writers of some of the most vistied Wikipedia articles
The Signpost: 15 June 2016
- News and notes: Clarifications on status and compensation of outgoing executive directors Sue Gardner and Lila Tretikov
WMF board chair Patricio Lorente answers questions
- Special report: Wikiversity Journal—A new user group
Wikimedia enters academic publishing
- Featured content: From the crème de la crème
Eleven featured articles, nine featured lists and fourteen featured pictures
- In the media: Biography disputes; Craig Newmark donation; PR editing
Recent media coverage of Wikipedia and Wikimedia
- Op-ed: Commons Picture of the Year; Wikidata licensing
Two for the price of one—do the popular Commons image contest and Wikidata licensing serve the community as well as they should?
- Traffic report: Another one with sports; Knockout, brief candle
Wikipedia's most read articles in the last two weeks
- Blog: Why I proofread poetry at Wikisource
Poetry: “it is the stuff of the soul; it speaks to the body, the mind, and the spirit alike.” Sonja Bohm worked for years to get all of Florence Earle Coates’ poetry online, and now proofreads poetry on the English Wikisource, the free library. We asked why.
Books & Bytes - Issue 17
Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria
- New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
- Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
- New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
TWL HighBeam check-in
Hello Wikipedia Library Users,
You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:
- Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
- Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
- Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.
Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.
Thank you. 20:32, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 July 2016
- News and notes: Board unanimously appoints Katherine Maher as new WMF executive director; Wikimedia lawsuits in France and Germany
News from Wikimania and the courts
- Op-ed: Two policies in conflict?
Paid-contributions disclosure vs. outing
- In the media: Terrorism database cites Wikipedia as a source
Reliability worries
- Featured content: Triple fun of featured content
Six articles, nine lists, one topic and thirteen pictures promoted
- Traffic report: Goalposts; Oy vexit
European football and politics dominate the top-10
- Blog: Jimmy Wales names Emily Temple-Wood and Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight as Wikipedians of the Year
From the Wikimedia Foundation blog
"Stalking" vs "Targeting"
I thought the term Target was better, since this person is after you. I would have to suggest the best way to deal with a person like this is to just ignore them and delete their emails or IMs. If they see you won't respond, they'll feel inclined to keep doing it and give up. Sometimes it pays to be thick skinned. Aside from the fact he's been hounding you, the name "runtshit" would be blocked in any case since profanity usernames are generally not acceptable anyways. VegasCasinoKid (talk) 08:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- You really do not have the first idea what is going on here, and I suggest that you keep your ill-informed opinions to yourself until you have actually read the ten-year history involved. RolandR (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 July 2016
- News and notes: Board faces diversity and skill-base issues in new FDC appointments
Four seats to be filled in top WMF grantmaking body; General Counsel and Secretary Geoff Brigham leaves Wikimedia
- Discussion report: Busy month for discussions
New ArbCom restrictions; genetically modified food safety
- In the media: Women in science editathon gets national press; Wikipedia "shockingly biased"
Female scientists in India; Cracked.com probes Wikipedia's weaknesses
- Featured content: A wide variety from the best
Promotions in four featured-content forums
- Traffic report: Sports and esports
Northern summer makes sport the winner
- Arbitration report: Script writers appointed for clerks
Plus a clerk appointment and two motions
- Recent research: Using deep learning to predict article quality
Plus navigating the Chinese Wikipedia, and talkpage sentiment
The Signpost: 04 August 2016
- Editorial: Wikipedia policy suppresses sharing of information
And the Signpost loses and gains a co-editor-in-chief
- News and notes: Foundation presents results of harassment research, plans for automated identification; Wikiconference submissions open
WMF and Alphabet are developing an algorithm designed to detect personal attacks
- In the media: Paid editing service announced; Commercial exploitation of free images; Wikipedia as a crystal ball; Librarians to counter systemic bias
Plus Android and Taylor Swift
- Obituary: Kevin Gorman, who took on Wikipedia's gender gap and undisclosed paid advocacy, dies at 24
Condolences are being left on his English Wikipedia talk page
- Traffic report: Summer of Pokémon, Trump, and Hillary
Pokémon Go led the chart for two weeks running
- Featured content: Women and Hawaii
Eight articles, two lists and fourteen pictures were promoted
- Recent research: Easier navigation via better wikilinks
Plus: new Wiki Studies journal, Wikipedia usage on Twitter and more
- Blog: All-new notifications page helps Wikimedians focus on what matters most
WMF announces enhancements to the notifications system
- Technology report: User script report (January to July 2016, part 1)
New user scripts and other tech news
Changes Reverted
I have placed a new section at Talk:Karl Marx#Changes Reverted, please explain your revision there. DoomLexus (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Just out of curiosity
would mean he ranks with Dolph Lundgren and, if my memory is correct, Clint Walker. Similar bravado fantasy world in public, too! Nishidani (talk) 17:11, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- I disbelieve the claim. It was a very dubious link, which I traced back to an unsourced assertion by Caroline Glick. It should never have been in the article, and should certainly not have been restored by a repeatedly blocked editor immediately on return from his latest block for breach of a topic ban. RolandR (talk) 17:16, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- So do I, that's why I cited the two other examples, esp. Clint Walker.Nishidani (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am sceptical not merely about Netanyahu's IQ score, but also about whether this claim had ever been made outside Caroline Glick's article. I was also under the impression that the highest official IQ score was 160, and anything beyond that was an unscientific extrapolation (not that "official" scores are any more scientific). RolandR (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- Must be a change in method. In the standard test applied in schools back in the 50s, a 162 was registered by one kid in my class, and 4 within a few points of that. The genius went on to become a suburban doctor, with a hobby of drinking port wine. The fourth went up on criminal charges for malpractice, etc. To console those who wrongly attach value to such tests, and feel diminished by comparison, I suppose one should note that on that early scale Richard Feynman scored a measly 124 in high school, and became one of the finest minds of the last century. Nishidani (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am sceptical not merely about Netanyahu's IQ score, but also about whether this claim had ever been made outside Caroline Glick's article. I was also under the impression that the highest official IQ score was 160, and anything beyond that was an unscientific extrapolation (not that "official" scores are any more scientific). RolandR (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- So do I, that's why I cited the two other examples, esp. Clint Walker.Nishidani (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Hebrew to English
Hello Roland. Just a small question I couldn't find an answer in the internt. How can you translate the word "חניך" to something that isn't "student" or "pupil"? The definition in my context is "member of a yough organization", but is there a single word for it?--Bolter21 (talk to me) 01:20, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) According to Google Translate, it means "apprentice". Years ago, when I was a member of American Habonim, we were חניכים. I'm not sure, but I think Habonim Dror still uses the word. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- In FZY in Britain in the 60s, we had a מדריך, but not חניכים. We were simply members. I wouldn't use the word "apprentice", it sounds wrong. In an agricultural context, "trainee" could be OK; otherwise, maybe "cadet". RolandR (talk) 09:25, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Evidently the word חניך is no longer in use at Habonim Dror. Times have changed.
— MShabazz Talk/Stalk 14:05, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, Malik; that is fascinating! The idea of an inclusive Zionist summer camp raises so many questions, it's hard to know where to start. Many of my friends and contacts in Israel use the suffix "ים\ות" "im/ot", which is now quite common in leftist texts. But of course the same problem, in a different form, arises even in English, and my son demands to be addressed as "e" rather than "he" or "she". RolandR (talk) 17:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 August 2016
- News and notes: Focus on India—WikiConference produces new apps; state government adopts free licenses
Conference draws highly diverse and productive participation, and several years' advocacy pays off in a new government policy
- Special report: Engaging diverse communities to profile women of Antarctica
Guest post recaps in-depth engagement of experts to address Wikipedia gender gap while improving coverage of their field
- In the media: The ugly, the bad, the playful, and the promising
Wikipedia coverage ranged from sobering to playful in this issue's roundup
- Featured content: Simply the best ... from the last two weeks
Eight articles, eleven lists, one topic and five pictures were promoted
- Traffic report: Olympic views
Politics gives way to sports, TV and film
- Technology report: User script report (January–July 2016, part 2)
A review of numerous useful Wikipedia customizations
- Arbitration report: The Michael Hardy case
New case opened, and a reminder to administrators not to impose blocks based on private information
Thanks for adding a reference, but I don't find it very convincing. I've found plenty of places where people are claiming they've heard this photo is fake, but nowhere does anyone provide any evidence or a copy of the alleged original photo. This art journalist could easily have just repeated some hearsay.
Futhermore, I've found at least two more similar photos taken at the same time, each of which shows a different facial expression for both men: [2] [3]. It seems implausible that a forger would go to the trouble of faking all of them. – Smyth\talk 22:22, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Additional discussion here, but still no real evidence either way. – Smyth\talk 22:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- The falsity of this picture is well known, and has been discussed in countless articles. Few of them, however, would be considered reliable sources for Wikipedia (equally, it is very hard to find a reliable source which uses this image without a disclaimer). I have read an article which reproduces the alleged original pictures which were spliced together to form this, but can't find it at the moment. For now, we have one reliable source which states that this is a fake image, and none which say anything different. RolandR (talk) 00:14, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 18
Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads
- New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
- Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
- TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
- OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
| Hello Roland, best regards from the Netherlands Amin (talk) 15:42, 19 October 2016 (UTC) |
Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 19
Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti
- New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
- New Library Card Platform and Conference news
- Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links
19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
Translation help
Hello Roland. How would you translate "הוא קיבל תואר ראשון בהצטיינות"?--Bolter21 (talk to me) 02:17, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- "He gained/was awarded a distinction in his first degree". Depending on the context, it could mean a BA with 1st class honours; is this possibly originally a translation from English?RolandR (talk) 12:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- The original text is: "בשנת 1998 חזר ללמוד במכללת ספיר, שם למד מדעי ניהול ומדעי המדינה, וקיבל תואר ראשון בהצטיינות.", which I translated as "...received his Bachelor's degree with honors", with the trust given to google translate. I"ve never heard the term "Bachelor's degree" nor "honors" in that context, so it seemed very suspicious to me.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Those would both be perfectly good English translations, understandable by anyone in Britain, and I imagine also anyone in the USA. A "Bachelor's degree" is a first degree, BSc/BA or other, while most degrees are awarded as a simple pass, or with Third Class, Upper or Lower Second Class, or First Class honours. It's not certain, but I would interpret "בהצטיינות" to mean First Class or Upper Second honours.RolandR (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Alright. Thanks.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:19, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- Those would both be perfectly good English translations, understandable by anyone in Britain, and I imagine also anyone in the USA. A "Bachelor's degree" is a first degree, BSc/BA or other, while most degrees are awarded as a simple pass, or with Third Class, Upper or Lower Second Class, or First Class honours. It's not certain, but I would interpret "בהצטיינות" to mean First Class or Upper Second honours.RolandR (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
- The original text is: "בשנת 1998 חזר ללמוד במכללת ספיר, שם למד מדעי ניהול ומדעי המדינה, וקיבל תואר ראשון בהצטיינות.", which I translated as "...received his Bachelor's degree with honors", with the trust given to google translate. I"ve never heard the term "Bachelor's degree" nor "honors" in that context, so it seemed very suspicious to me.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
Charles Marowitz Birth Date
Hello There, Regarding Charles Marowitz birth date - I am his widow and in possession of his birth certificate. The New York Times worked with me on the drafting of his obit - I sent them a copy of the birth certificate. They are the only publication that used the correct date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allwinomar (talk • contribs) 00:10, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- The article cites the Daily Telegraph and the Los Angeles Times, which both state that Marowitz was born in 1934. You deliberately misquoted the Telegraph, citing it as a source for a birth date of 1932. This is not acceptable. If you think that the sources are mistaken, and that there is a better source, you need to raise this on the article talk page and gain consensus for this change. In fact, it appears that you have made the same edit in the past using a different account, when your edit was again reverted and our rules of verifiability were explained to you. You cannot simply assert that you know better, in defiance of the sources available to us. RolandR (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
ACTUALLY - I QUOTED THE NEW YORK TIMES AS MY SOURCE AND THEY GOT THE INFORMATION FROM THE COPY OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE I PROVIDED THEM WITH. I WORKED CLOSELY WITH MR. BRUCE WEBER IN ORDER TO GET THE CORRECT INFORMATION INCLUDED IN HIS OBIT. ALL THE OTHER OBITS ARE WRONG ON HIS BIRTH DATE. CHECK YOUR FACTS BEFORE FIRING OFF A RUDE REPLY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allwinomar (talk • contribs) 00:57, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- No, you didn't. You altered the year, while still linking to the source which stated that he was born in 1934. And all the sources cited in the article confirm 1934 as the year of birth. We need more than your assertion to alter this. And this discussion should be taking place on the article talk page, not here. RolandR (talk) 09:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry for horning in here. The widow is right, the NYT obit is here. (Actually I was looking at the previous thread, which interested me because I made the sockpuppet complaint). I have updated the article. Regards, Ravpapa (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, RolandR. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- News and notes: Arbitration Committee elections commence
An overview of the English Wikipedia ArbCom election; brief notes as Asian and African initiatives wind down
- In the media: Roundup of news related to U.S. presidential election and more
Election prompts media to explore themes important to Wikipedians, including news literacy, privacy, and data security
- Blog: The top fifteen winning photos from Wiki Loves Earth
115,000 images were submitted as part of the annual competition.
- Gallery: Around the world with Wiki Loves Monuments 2016
A sampling of photo submissions to the annual photography campaign
- Featured content: Featured mix
Eight articles, two lists and nine pictures were promoted
- Special report: Taking stock of the Good Article backlog
A close examination of the efficacy of the GA Cup contest, a longstanding effort to reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review
- Op-ed: Fundraising data should be more transparent
Empowering volunteers and local chapters to engage with fundraising would yield varied benefits
- Traffic report: President-elect Trump
Someone is likely to dominate traffic for a long time
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on 2016
Roundup of the year's news from the Wikimedia world, featuring Wikipedia's 15th anniversary and organizational disarray at the Wikimedia Foundation
- News and notes: Strategic planning update; English ArbCom election results
WMF reflects, to some degree, on its past approaches to strategic planning
- Special report: German ArbCom implodes
The German Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee loses more than half its members amid political feud
- In focus: Active user page filter prevents vandalism and harassment
A proposal from the Inspire Campaign to address harassment was recently implemented to prevent unconstructive and malicious editing on user pages
- Op-ed: Operation successful, patient dead: Outreach workshops in Namibia
Even a well executed outreach event can yield disappointing results
- In the media: In brief: Coverage of gender gap initiatives, banner fundraising, and more
Wikipedia women in the news, and media reacts to 2016 ad banner campaign
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
Twenty-three articles, ten lists and twenty-one pictures were promoted
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
And a roundup of recently-added tools
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
Four weeks of popular article analysis
- Blog: Wiki Loves Monuments contest winners announced
Winning photos in world's largest photography contest reveal a world of monuments—and the volunteers who love them
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
Privacy and Tor, and several other studies
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
Building toward better recruitment and retention
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
A close look at the history of approving administrators on English Wikipedia, and a roundup of news
- Interview: What is it like to edit Wikipedia when you're blind?
The wiki environment can appear deceptively uniform, but it masks strikingly different editorial experiences
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
The latest media reports
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
Twelve articles, thirteen lists and twelve pictures were promoted
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
Various minor developments
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
If you're reading this, you escaped 2016 alive
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
Data sets now available on Commons, wishes to be worked on in 2017, and a recap of the Wikimedia Developer Summit
- Recent research: Female Wikipedians aren't more likely to edit women biographies; Black Lives Matter in Wikipedia
And several other research papers reviewed and summarized
Books and Bytes - Issue 20
Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)
- Partner resource expansions
- New search tool for finding TWL resources
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikidata Visiting Scholar
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Translation help.
Hey Roland. I need your help again. I need to translate this sentence: "הסיבה לשינוי היתה ידיעות מוטעות על הקדמת פינויו של הצבא הבריטי מהעיר". Google translate did not help and I translated it as "...false reports of a fast British evacuation from the city" which sounds very bad, since I don't know what is the translation for "הקדמה".--Bolter21 (talk to me) 16:04, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Bolter. I'm on a train journey, so don't have my dictionaries to hand. "הקדמה" would normally mean "introduction", but that clearly does not make sense in this context. The best sense I can make of the sentence is "bringing forward", which would be clumsy, so it might make more sense to rewrite the sentence as "false reports that the British had brought forward their evacuation". Was the text originally written in Hebrew, or is it a translation? If the latter, I would suggest trying to consult the original. RolandR (talk) 17:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. The text is a quote from an Hebrew source. I think that naturally, since "הקדמה" is of the same root of "earlier", maybe "earlier British evacuation" might be the answer.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 00:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
The two statements prompt extensive community discussion; plus, our updates on recent ArbCom decisions
- Special report: Wolves nip at Wikipedia's heels: A perspective on the cost of paid editing
Undisclosed paid editing by a financial broker mired in scandal spans years, impacting Wikipedia's editors and readers
- News and notes: Official WMF rebuke to Trump policy; WMF secures restricted funds
Foundation's latest foray into political waters, and grants funding structured data and anti-harassment measures, met with enthusiasm and concern
- In focus: WMF strategy consultant brings background in crisis reputation management; Team behind popular WMF software put "on pause"
Several developments in the $2.5 million strategic planning process explored, and a team within the software production department is sidelined
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
Our second interview with the productive WikiProject Birds crew
- Op-ed: How to make editing workshops useful, even if participants don't stick around
Veteran editing workshop leader responds to a previous Signpost op-ed
- In the media: Presidential politics, periodic table, and our periodic roundup of updates
Wikipedia's response to Trump inauguration and a fruitful, public "edit war" lead our media updates
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
Plus the latest scripts, bots, and tech news
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
Three weeks of the most popular Wikipedia articles
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
Twenty-eight articles, seven lists, two topics and four pictures were promoted
- Forum: Productive collaboration around coordinated protest marches; Media and political personalities comment on Wikipedia at its 16th birthday celebration
Women's marches on seven continents attracted strong Wikipedia engagement; Media luminaries and a presidential candidate joined WMF boss Katherine Maher at a New York gathering
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
The Signpost's poll suggests we should take a cautious approach to the Newsletter Extension, under development; and our RSS feed is functional once again
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
This month's edition focuses on research about the role of Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
Demonstrations of developers' experiments and works in progress
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
Is the Daily Mail fake news and your media roundup
- Gallery: A Met montage
A selection of CC0 images from the Metropolitan Museum of Art
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
An overview of English Wikipedia's peer review process
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
Increased WMF spending every year is not sustainable
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
Fifteen articles, two lists, and six pictures were promoted
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
They may not mix in life, but they do in popularity
- Blog: WikiIndaba 2017: A continent gathers to chart a path forward
Republished from the Wikimedia blog
User:Crissedcrossed
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 15:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 21
Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)
- #1lib1ref 2017
- Wikipedia Library User Group
- Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
- Spotlight: Library Card Platform
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Your comment in the SAQ Arbitration thread
I'm not even sure I understand the point of view you're supporting or opposing here:
"Statement by RolandR
No-one seems to have responded to Proximity's argument that "in a partisan controversy, no partisan adherent should be allowed to stand in for, to represent for his or her adversaries, their points of view --whether those points of view be of the minority or of the majority. Every camp, every arguant's position should be reserved for explanation, presentation and clarification by partisans, and only by partisans, of each point of view concerned." This is so clearly against Wikipedia's norms and guidelines that it cannot be ignored. Wikipedia is based on a neutral point of view. This does not mean that editors may not hold particular points of view, but does mean that we must edit neutrally. We should not ignore and dismiss the point of view of those we disagree with, and nor may we present our own point of view as unquestioned fact. Wikipedia is not a debating chamber, and articles should not be a place where rival points of view are presented and voted on. If Proximity cannot accept this basic rule, then they have no business editing anywhere on Wikipedia, and least of all in such a highly contentious article. RolandR (talk) 22:34, 2 May 2017 (UTC)"
( by the way, I have no clear idea to whom you are referring by "they", above? )
I wonder if you understood my point-- "Every camp, every arguant's (i.e. disputant's) position should be reserved for explanation, presentation and clarification by partisans- (clarification: that is, by each position's own partisan participants rather than by their adversaries), and only by (those) partisans, of each point of view concerned." In short, Stratfordian partisans in the SAQ should have no more business exclusively taking on the role of explaining what their advesaries' point of view is* than the other way around--in which case, the Stratfordian partisans would be screaming to high heaven.
Am I to understand that it is this which you mean when you write that, "This is so clearly against Wikipedia's norms and guidelines that it cannot be ignored" ? Proximity1 (talk) 07:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not supporting or opposing any point of view, merely pointing out how Wikipedia works. And please remember to indent your comments properly, as others have already asked you. RolandR (talk) 08:51, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Please clarify
You changed "at times" to "on one occasion" in this edit. MShabbazz asked you to clarify why you made this change. Please provide a quote or other proof that the change was justified. Debresser (talk) 11:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- If you had bothered to look at the article talk page before coming here to interrogate me, you would have seen that I have already been engaged in extensive discussion and clarification of exactly this point. That is what article talk pages are for. RolandR (talk) 12:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- You are right. Sorry. At the same time, no need to be so bitchy. Debresser (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
- From the editors: Signpost status: On reserve power, help wanted!
Inviting new writers, editors, and ideas
- News and notes: Global Elections
WMF Board election results, and FDC elections begin
- Arbitration report: Cases closed in the Pacific and with Magioladitis
Two cases were closed from 19 February to 27 March.
- Op-ed: Wikipedia's lead sentence problem
Lead sentence metadata is out of control and a serious impediment to readability
- Featured content: Three months in the land of the featured
Eighty-eight articles, forty-three lists, five topics and twenty-two pictures were promoted
- In the media: Did Wikipedia just assume Garfield's gender?
Garfield is male, and other places Wikipedia made the news
- Recent research: Wikipedia bot wars capture the imagination of the popular press
...but are they real?; personality and attitudes to Wikipedia; large expert review experiment
- Technology report: Tech news catch-up
Bots, scripts, tools, and changes from February to June 2017
- Traffic report: Film on Top: Sampling the weekly top 10
Two weeks of film dominance: Baahubali and the Academy Awards
Books and Bytes - Issue 22
Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017
- New and expanded research accounts
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
- Bytes in brief
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
- News and notes: Departments reorganized at Wikimedia Foundation, and a month without new RfAs (so far)
While the English Wikipedia community produces no new requests for adminhood in June, the Wikimedia Foundation makes changes to the Product and Technology departments.
- In the media: Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
The anatomy of Uber CEO Travis Kalanick's chest area has been the talk of the month. But so have high-profile edits, hacked articles, and one particular newborn growing up.
- Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take
Exploring sourcing issues in Wikimedia projects, a solution in Wikidata and fact mining, and a newsletter to continue the conversation.
- Featured content: Will there ever be a break? The slew of featured content continues
22 featured articles, 17 featured lists, 7 featured pictures
- Traffic report: Wonder Woman beats Batman, The Mummy, Darth Vader and the Earth
Summer blockbusters and sports, Trump and world events.
- Recent research: Utopian bubbles: Can Wikipedians create value outside of the capitalist system?
A researcher applies Marxist critiques of political economy to investigate whether gamification, a culture of altruism, and other anti-corporatist influences on peer production can create a sustainable gift economy in a project like Wikipedia.
- Technology report: Improved search, and WMF data scientist tells all
Search now can include sister projects; EpochFail
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on
This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:
Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.
The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
- 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".
The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:
- 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.
The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".
Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:18, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Hebrew?
I somehow seem to remember that you understood Hebrew? If so, could you please tale a look at User:Huldra/Ben-Arieh? The Ben-Arieh article here has a lot of info about Palestinian villages, and I have tried to note which villages in User:Huldra/Ben-Arieh.
If you have time/interest, could you please check that I have gotten the names correct? And please add any one I have missed. So far I have only added villages which has been mentioned in the 1596 dafter, that is, this. I see Bolter21 is around, so Ill ask him, too. Huldra (talk) 21:42, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- Certainly. I'll look at this in the morning. RolandR (talk) 01:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 August 2017
- News and notes: Non-English special edition! 99% no news about English-based wiki communities!
Wikimania in Montreal, lawsuit in Sweden, challenges in France
- Recent research: Wikipedia can increase local tourism by +9%; predicting article quality with deep learning; recent behavior predicts quality
Local tourism gains +9% when Wikipedia articles are improved; significant improvements in predicting article quality with deep learning; recent editor behavior is a strong predictor of content quality
- WikiProject report: Comic relief
An interview with a project that is centered around comics.
- In the media: Wikipedia used to judge death penalty, arms smuggling, Indonesian governance, and HOTTEST celebrity
Wikipedia and reliable sources of information continue to define each other
- Traffic report: Swedish countess tops the list
Plus plenty of sports, film, and television
- Blog: Canadian Supreme Court rules against Google in favor of worldwide court orders
The Canadian Supreme Court ruled that Google must remove search results worldwide, dismissing concerns that this may impede freedom of expression for people outside of Canada or inspire other countries to censor speech.
- Special report: Sharing Wikipedia offline medical information in the Dominican Republic
Wikimedia contributors support each other's projects in many unexpected ways
- Featured content: Everywhere in the lead
Recently promoted articles, lists and pictures – with a very heavy one in the mix
- Technology report: Introducing TechCom
The Architecture Committee adopts a new charter and name; and the latest in script, bot, and tech news
- Humour: WWASOHs and ETCSSs
An elite squad of highly insightful editors can lead the way for other editors who may need to retrain their faces into forming a smile.
Books and Bytes - Issue 23
Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017
- Library card
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
- Bytes in brief
Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Category
Regarding [4] and [5], see also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2017 September 2 and User talk:DVdm#Mass removal. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- I have already commented at the CfD. RolandR (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- Ha indeed. Sorry, I had missed that. Cheers and thanks. - DVdm (talk) 23:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 September 2017
- News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL
News from Wikimedia France, Wikimedia Macedonia, and Wikimedia Israel's; Autoconfirmed article creation trial begins
- In the media: Monkey settlement; Wikipedia used to give AI context clues
Also: Jeopedia, Dubaipedia, shaping science, fake quote reused by scholarly sources
- Humour: Chickenz
The best that poultry has to offer
- Recent research: Wikipedia articles vs. concepts; Wikipedia usage in Europe
Plus the latest research publications.
- Technology report: Flow restarted; Wikidata connection notifications
Plus more tech news, and the latest scripts and bots
- Gallery: Chicken mania
Complimenting this issue's Humour about chickens...
- Special report: Two steps forward, one step backward: The Sustainability Initiative
Finally we're seeing some initial successes, but the Wikimedia movement is still far from being environmentally sustainable.
- Traffic report: Fights and frights
Boxing, hurricanes, clowns, and more!
- Featured content: Flying high
Newly featured birds, planes, and high achievers
Books and Bytes - Issue 24
Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
- Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
- Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2017
- News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!
The Wikimedia Foundation publishes the latest fundraising report, convenes over the close of the strategic plan discussion, and moves into a new space.
- Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables
A variety of topics promoted.
- Humour: Guys named Ralph
If your name is Ralph, well sorry.
- In focus: Offline Wikipedia developed at OFF.NETWORK Content Hackathon
Advocates for sharing offline information gather to make content, software, hardware, and social decisions.
- Blog: The future of offline access to Wikipedia: The Kiwix example
A chat with a developer of open source software which allows users to download web content for offline reading, and the future of offline access to Wikipedia.
- In the media: Facebook and poetry
Fighting fake news and plagiarism.
- Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK
Wikimedia UK's partnerships and achievements working with GLAM institutions.
- Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment
Readers interested in the the death of Hef, Puerto Rico, films and television.
Maybe dial back template drama?
Templating an editor with an accusation of defamation or libel for an edit like this is not helpful. Your own edit summary said "Unhelpful, and borderline vandalism". It's quite a leap from borderline vandalism to defamation. The first thing to know about that is that the WP:BLP policy doesn't apply to criticism of a country. Your revert was justified, and perhaps a talk page warning was acceptable, but please dial it back a bit with the warnings.
You could even consider talk page discussion before issuing warnings, or other avenues of dispute resolution. Just my opinion. I haven't reverted any of your edits. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- The edit I reverted was not criticism of a country; it was criticism (in my reading, defamatory criticism) of a group of political activists, and therefore covered by BLP. RolandR (talk) 16:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- WP:BLPGROUP makes that a dubious claim. If the group were a discrete set of named individuals, like say The Beatles, then it's more BLP-ish. But a movement can include formal members, leaders, followers, associates, contributors, supporters, sympathizers, fellow travelers. Defamation and libel are specific legal terms and if I badmouth Bronys, that doesn't mean any specific individual brony is going to have a libel case. Blowing it out of proportion shifts the dispute from their edit to your reaction. The overreach gives the other guy an opportunity to cast himself as the victim of a false accusation, and now you're the one playing defense. Would you rather focus on what they did or what you did? A light touch keeps your own behavior out of the spotlight.
You're indisputably on solid ground if you say the edit violates WP:NPOV, and that's a good enough reason for a warning and a revert. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:20, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- And most certainly not a final warning. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- It was an only, not a final, warning. And I gave that because only yesterday another editor had given them a final warning for vandalism. RolandR (talk) 21:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- And most certainly not a final warning. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
- WP:BLPGROUP makes that a dubious claim. If the group were a discrete set of named individuals, like say The Beatles, then it's more BLP-ish. But a movement can include formal members, leaders, followers, associates, contributors, supporters, sympathizers, fellow travelers. Defamation and libel are specific legal terms and if I badmouth Bronys, that doesn't mean any specific individual brony is going to have a libel case. Blowing it out of proportion shifts the dispute from their edit to your reaction. The overreach gives the other guy an opportunity to cast himself as the victim of a false accusation, and now you're the one playing defense. Would you rather focus on what they did or what you did? A light touch keeps your own behavior out of the spotlight.
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, RolandR. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Books and Bytes - Issue 25
Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017
- OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
Global article creation contest/editathon exceeds expectations.
- Blog: Close encounters of the Wikipedia kind
Astronaut is first to specifically contribute to Wikipedia from space.
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
Seventeen articles, twenty-nine lists, three pictures and one featured topic were promoted.
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
The media discuss online copyright issues, Wikipedia's coverage of the capital of Israel and creation of a "reasonably clean, honest and reliable" work on Earth and in space.
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
Evidence phase in Mister Wiki editors case is complete; the community is proposing remedies and the Arbitration committee is slated to make a decision by end of year. Meanwhile, voting has closed on 2017 elections.
- Gallery: Wiki loving
Winners of the international photo competitions Wiki Loves Earth and Wiki Loves Monuments.
- Interview: Interview with Charlesjsharp, regular contributor of Wikipedia's Featured Pictures
Looking back on a decade of contributions including over 1,000 images and over three dozen Featured Pictures, Charles shares his wildlife photography experience and tips.
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
And other recent research publications.
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
Including improved blocking tools, new user scripts, and the latest technical news.
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys
We like our heroes and bad guys.
- Humour: On their way to the WMF Incubator
u-nye-loo-lay-doo?Dochvetlh vISoplaHbe’.
The Signpost: 16 January 2018
- News and notes: Communication is key
Two new WMF Communications department leadership appointments; a new way for Wikimedia communities to communicate their capacities.
- In the media: The Paris Review, British Crown and British Media
Wikipedia manipulated and copied – again
- Featured content: History, gaming and multifarious topics
Historical and pop culture articles promoted.
- Interview: Interview with Ser Amantio di Nicolao, the top contributor to English Wikipedia by edit count
How do you make an average of 3,600 edits a week for over a decade? And what do you learn when you've done it?
- Technology report: Dedicated Wikidata database servers
Plus the latest technology upgrades, tools and news.
- Humour: Why don't we have an article about _________?
Notable missing articles.
- Arbitration report: Mister Wiki is first arbitration committee decision of 2018
In deciding to de-sysop an admin for efforts to evade discussion and review of paid edits made on behalf of a PR firm, Arbitration Committee doesn't significantly change the rules around paid editing, and leaves it up to the community whether to apply special restrictions to administrators.
- Traffic report: The best and worst of 2017
A look back at the most popular articles in a tumultuous and intriguing year.
Books and Bytes - Issue 26
Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- User Group update
- Global branches update
- Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
- Bytes in brief
Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 February 2018
- Op-ed: Do editors have the right to be forgotten?
Should an editor's block history be a permanent "rap sheet", or does Wikipedia forgive and forget? A reform initiative has begun.
- Featured content: Wars, sieges, disasters and everything black possible
Exemplary content recognized between January 12 and January 20, 2018
- Recent research: Automated Q&A from Wikipedia articles; Who succeeds in talk page discussions?
Also: Polish quality, Russian political mythologization, and multilingual analyses
- Blog: New monthly dataset shows where people fall into Wikipedia rabbit holes
The Wikimedia Foundation's Analytics team compiles a clickstream dataset, now available as a series of monthly data dumps for English, Russian, German, Spanish, and Japanese Wikipedias.
- Interview: Interview with The Rambling Man, Wikipedia's top contributor of Featured Lists
Lessons on Creating a Featured List
- Traffic report: TV, death, sports, and doodles
The most popular articles for January 14 to 27
- Special report: Cochrane–Wikipedia Initiative
A partnership to improve and update Wikipedia's medical content
- Arbitration report: New cases requested for inter-editor hostility and other collaboration issues
Politeness and collegial behavior about to be taken up by Arbcom, and perhaps a revisit of the infobox question.
- In the media: Solving crime; editing out violence allegations
Also, did UCF really win?
- Humour: You really are in Wonderland
Enjoy the humour of another contributor
Speedy deletion declined: Tobias Hübinette
Hello RolandR. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tobias Hübinette, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I don't speak Swedish, but the article at sv:Tobias Hübinette looks like he might be notable enough. Thank you. SoWhy 11:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2018
- News and notes: The future is Swedish with a lack of administrators
Sweden selected for Wikimania 2019; research report on shaping the future; a scarcity of RfAs.
- Recent research: Politically diverse editors write better articles; Reddit and Stack Overflow benefit from Wikipedia but don't give back
There might be good things about an edit war.
- Arbitration report: Arbitration committee prepares to examine two new cases
Editor in self-imposed exile and infobox wars a thorn in the side of arbitration committee.
- Traffic report: Addicted to sports and pain
The Superbowl, the Winter Olympics, death, and accusations of unspeakable things.
- Featured content: Entertainment, sports and history
An eclectic mix of promotions.
- Technology report: Paragraph-based edit conflict screen; broken thanks
And other recent tech news.
- Humour: Impossible and unexplained traffic report
Stubs get a lot of pageviews.
Notification
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WikiNutt's harassment of RolandR. GMGtalk 12:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- Op-ed: Death knell for The Signpost?
Is The Signpost on its last legs?
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
Wikimedia events, group recognition, and individual appointments are ongoing.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
Arbcom considers new discretionary sanctions for infoboxes and an extension of 1RR.
- In the media: The media on Wikipedia's workings: the good and not-so-good
Diplomats join Wikipedia for International Women's Day, the perfect "Human", how fringe theories are sustained, and perennial plagiarism from our pages.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
Wakanda still fascinates; the Oscars happened; Winter Olympics come to a close; and International Women's Day gets over a million page views.
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
A plethora of content.
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
Reviewing a browser skin providing equal emphasis on both content and editing tools simultaneously.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
Retrospective on article creation trial.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
Nostalgia and trips down Memory Lane.
I apologize
Could you kindly refer me to the right English section where to report acts of bullying? I can not find it, thanks--Razorblade76 (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
- English Wikipedia has absolutely no jurisdiction over Italian Wikipedia. You should raise any issues or problems there, not here. RolandR (talk) 11:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 27
Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018
- #1Lib1Ref
- New collections
- Alexander Street (expansion)
- Cambridge University Press (expansion)
- User Group
- Global branches update
- Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
- Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
- Bytes in brief
Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
