User talk:Nahraf Moha

February 2025

Hello, I'm Annh07. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:SHORTDESC have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Annh07 (talk) 08:29, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with Wikipedia:SHORTDESC. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 09:03, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Afar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 12:23, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nahraf Moha/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nahraf Moha! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:46, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Annh07 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nahraf Moha/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Annh07 (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nahraf Moha

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Nahraf Moha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:25, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm Jfire. An edit that you recently made to Afar Triangle seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jfire (talk) 02:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Afar Triangle, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jfire (talk) 03:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Afar Triangle, you may be blocked from editing. Jfire (talk) 03:49, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Afar language. Your repeatedly inserted material was not relating to the subject of the article, unsufficiently formatted, and violating the Wikipedia manual of style, particularly with respect to what information can be placed where in an article. LandLing 08:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nahraf_Moha reported by User:Jfire (Result: ). Thank you. Jfire (talk) 04:38, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing // no communication // addition of material generated by AI/LLM.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite Unblock Request

I understand that some of my past edit and text that looked like ai generated content and material without reliable source. i realize this was disruptive and suitable for Wikipedia and i apologize for the mistake.

i want to continue contributing but this time i will carefully follow the rules. i will only add information supported by reliable source, avoid ai generated text and use article talk page if there is ony dispute.

i kindly ask for another chance to edit responsible.

Thank You. Nahraf Moha (talk) 16:06, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Nahraf Moha/sandbox

Hello, Nahraf Moha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Nahraf Moha/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Nahraf Moha/sandbox

Hello, Nahraf Moha. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 11:26, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer bot II I understand that some of my past edit and text that looked like ai generated content and material without reliable source. i realize this was disruptive and suitable for Wikipedia and i apologize for the mistake.

i want to continue contributing but this time i will carefully follow the rules. i will only add information supported by reliable source, avoid ai generated text and use article talk page if there is ony dispute.

i kindly ask for another chance to edit responsible.

Thank You. Nahraf Moha (talk) 16:02, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nahraf Moha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that some of my past edit and text that looked like ai generated content and material without reliable source. i realize this was disruptive and suitable for Wikipedia and i apologize for the mistake. i want to continue contributing but this time i will carefully follow the rules. i will only add information supported by reliable source, avoid ai generated text and use article talk page if there is ony dispute. i kindly ask for another chance to edit responsible. Thank You. Nahraf Moha (talk) 15:26, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say the material "looked like ai generated content and material without reliable source." (emphasis mine). It didn't look like that. It was that. Why you are trying to downplay this is beyond me. Yamla (talk) 19:51, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.