User talk:Grownarwahl

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Please see WP:ANI#Slow-motion/quiet edit warring at Pig Goat Banana Cricket. Magitroopa (talk) 15:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello! I'm Jamie Eilat. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page Amphibia (TV series) have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — Jamie Eilat (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know it was incorrect information. Grownarwahl (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pig Goat Banana Cricket. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 23:35, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 15:15, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Plano Senior High School, you may be blocked from editing. Really? You restored an alumnus with a nine-year-old cn. Provide a reliable source for his attendance or don't restore it. Meters (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Naked and Afraid. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: All this editor has added to Wikipedia today is a load of unsourced content. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:35, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 23:38, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Please see WP:ANI#Disruptive user now WP:NOTHERE?. Magitroopa (talk) 02:19, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mfield (Oi!) 04:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have indefinitely blocked your account from editing to prevent further disruption to the project by your continual addition of unsourced content to articles despite multiple warnings and three separate blocks for this same behavior. If you wish to return to editing you will have to justify why you have continued to edit in this way, have failed to respond to outreach from other editors, and what you will be doing to change your editing in future. You should take the time you are blocked to read the material you have been linked to multiple times about sourcing Mfield (Oi!) 04:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]