User talk:FONTYBITS

Welcome!

Hello, FONTYBITS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Kingdom Hall does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Katieh5584 (talk) 16:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm Katieh5584. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Kingdom Hall because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 16:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom Hall. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kingdom Hall was changed by FONTYBITS (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2014-05-10T16:49:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom Hall, you may be blocked from editing. Katieh5584 (talk) 17:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kingdom Hall. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. You are citing a web forum as a source. Web forums are not considered reliable sources. You need to wait until this information can be reliably sourced.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:13, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to disrupt the article, you will be reported to admins. This is your final warning.--Jeffro77 (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Temporary block

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, as you did at Kingdom Hall. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Jayron32 12:46, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that after your block expired, you've returned to similar behaviour. Adding material with no source is not any better than using an unacceptable source. You need to wait until the information can be properly sourced according to Wikipedia's policies. You should probably also read WP:SOURCE. Additionally, the tone of your edit is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]