Jump to content

User talk:EggRoll97/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Tech News: 2025-06

MediaWiki message delivery 00:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

But an open language model is ready to help.
The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
Editor Fathoms Below reminisces over their successful RfA from February 2024.
Plus, reports on the ARBPIA5 case, new concerns over projects targeting Wikipedia editors, John Green gets his sponsor flowers, and other news.
Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
Ending with some bans, and a new set of editing sanctions.
The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.

Edit filter request

Hi EggRoll, could you take a look at this? It got archived due to inactivity, but I'd like an EFM to take a look at it. Thanks Nobody (talk) 07:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

A lot of it seems to depend on independent assessment, so it may be a bad candidate for specifically the edit filter, especially since it's a lot of domains. I'm thinking the title blacklist may be better for this than a filter. EggRoll97 (talk) 07:32, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
While it needs independent assessment, it's not really complicated. As for blacklisting: I thought about that too, but since copyright violations are most of the time good-faith mistakes, instead of bad faith vandalism, an edit filter sounded more reasonable to me. Nobody (talk) 07:36, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
I think honestly the best idea would be for any domains that are absolutely not going to be used legitimately to be added to Special:BlockedExternalDomains. Any that have a legitimate use would need some independent assessment, and CopyPatrol does a fair enough job of that. I guess I'm just not necessarily wanting to create a whole new filter for an issue that can far more easily be addressed by just blocking the domains. EggRoll97 (talk) 07:39, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
This probably should be discussed at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#Discussion to see if admins agree. Nobody (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-07

MediaWiki message delivery 00:09, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-08

MediaWiki message delivery 21:19, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | Renewal RFC phase
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello EggRoll97! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Question about reporting repeated vandalism, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:15, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-09

MediaWiki message delivery 00:38, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

French Wikipedia defends a user against public threats, steward elections, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
"The only time I ever took photos in my entire life".
From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
Or just the end of Wikipedia as we know it?
Of "hunters", "busybodies" and "dancers".
User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.
What are they? Why are they important? How can we make them better? And what can you do to help?
Liberté, liberté chérie.
Grammys, politics and the Super Bowl.
Straight from the source's mouth. A source is a source, of course, of course!
Turkish linguist wrote about languages and plants; Brazilian informaticist studied Wikimedia projects and education.

Tech News: 2025-10

MediaWiki message delivery 02:28, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-11

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello EggRoll97! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Just making sure, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:16, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-12

MediaWiki message delivery 23:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

It's an ecstasy, my spring.
Let them know what you think!
Read this, then forget all about it.
Life on the Wiki as usual!
And WMF invites multi-year research fund proposals
The Oscars, politics, and death elbow for the most attention.
The photographers are the celebrities!
And very unusual biographical images.
Send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.

Tech News: 2025-13

MediaWiki message delivery 22:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

When to threaten a recall

Don't want to do this on the main post, because it's not entirely relevant - but if you're going to threaten to recall somebody for taking a less than optimal tone while trying to correct misinformation about themselves in mainspace, then you should know that would set a dangerous precedent. The relationship between an article writer an a BLP subject will always be fraught. There's a massive power imbalance, for one thing - and that, especially to somebody that the community very clearly decided wasn't actually notable after all, can be terrifying. Going after somebody for not behaving perfectly in such a difficult moment just feels cruel. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 08:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

I don't think the massive power imbalance you're referring to necessarily exists when it comes to an administrator. Even as a BLP subject, an administrator still wields tools that can cause damage, and has more technical power than a regular editor, even if they're "not supposed to" use it. This isn't to mention that administrators are purposefully held to a higher standard, whether they are a BLP subject or not. I would expect an administrator to conduct themselves in a manner befitting a representative of the community, and making disparaging remarks about other editors, such as Is this appropriate handling of complaints about BLP accuracy? Or do I need to shut up and let a bunch of people who apparently don't know how to write a BLP continue to get it wrong? is unacceptable for someone who holds the community's trust. There are better ways to communicate, and this is only the first of many apparent incidents regarding their comments about the community, as evidenced by links and commentary on the main post. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
I think you've mistaken my intent - I'm not here to re-litigate the CU consultation or discuss Tamzin's behaviour in general, especially behind their back in a semi-public forum. Sorry. Swore off that kind of stuff when I graduated the ninth grade. I think we're going to have to fundamentally agree to disagree as to whether or not the fact that somebody is an admin is enough to get over the fact that the other editors (who were also administrators with more technical power than you or I!) did have a large amount of control over the situation. And, speaking generally, I think that if I woke up and found a Wikipedia administrator mistakenly using a hit piece that I'd specifically told them wasn't reliable, then I'd have freaked out and said something a whole lot worse. Which isn't to say the comments were especially kind, or that they should have said it. And you're right, we should hold administrators to a higher standard when it comes to civility. There's just.. a lotta different cases I'd use first. GreenLipstickLesbian💌🦋 02:46, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

EFH

Hello. I'm considering running again for EFH soon (maybe in a month or two), and would like some advice on how you think it would turn out. I'm pretty active at WP:EFFPR clerking reports, and on WP:EFR creating sample code for other people's ideas for filters. I have suggested some private filters (one to 1169 was implemented and I recently sent one regarding 984 to User:Codename Noreste, though I believe it was later forwarded to the mailing list). Anyways, any advice would be much appreciated. Thanks – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your EFFPR stats seem fine, your filter suggestions are generally fine, and I don't see any issue with the private filters requests. In the EFH request, I'd encourage you to link to at least a few of your public filter requests that were implemented, or code that you suggested that was implemented on a public filter. Best to give any random passersby who might not be able to see private filters the ability to evaluate your technical acumen. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-14

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-15

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

Fellow doctor Osama Khalid remains behind bars for "violating public morals" by editing.
Major changes to core content policy, or still-developing plan for new initiative?
Defeat, or just a setback?
Plus: 30-year anniversary of wiki software commemorated.
Our content is free, our infrastructure is not!
What is to be done?
Advice to aspirants: "Read RfA debriefs", including this one.
Rest in peace.
Snow White sinking, Adolescence soaring, spacefarers stranded, this list has it all!
The Wikimedia Foundation's announcement from Diff.
Gadzooks!

YGM

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 22:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

I should've said this before, but I've responded via email. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

RfA

Hi there! I saw that you have decided to run for adminship. I did not expect that nom early, considering it has been only 6 months since the last nom. I have supported you before at the AELECT, and I am happy to support you once more here since you have decided to work in an area that few users have specialized on. Good luck with the mop soon! ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:28, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-16

MediaWiki message delivery 00:21, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

I've added two late questions if you'd like to answer

Given the pending close of AELECT RfA, I'll confess my two questions are vaguely policy-choice based (translate that as potentially political). Feel free to choose not to answer directly if you wish. Further, I'll consider any statement about either experience as responsive to my question. Q: You are the only wikipedian so far who has experienced both these two separate permissions request processes first-hand. I think people who'd like to contrast the two experiences (like me) would very much value your unique personal vantage point. Good luck in any case. If I can ever be helpful, please call on me. BusterD (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Perhaps a debrief, (as we so often do with successful candidates) would be a better platform. But many would be interested. BusterD (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
@BusterD: Thanks for those at the RfA. I think I'll likely do a more in-depth debrief at some point, as I think WP:DEBRIEF could do with more than just successful candidacies. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
No worries. This is a growing time. Lots of real support for a real candidate. Take the critique you're given and profit from it. BusterD (talk) 18:10, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Great and pertinent answers to my queries at the process. Thank you! BusterD (talk) 18:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Appreciating a good egg

I'm sure you get many egg-cellent puns here so this won't be too egg-citing. I appreciate that you threw yourself into the meat grinder trying to help out. If it had felt like a time for silliness I would have supported with some insanity about you being ideal Admin material because of secretly being an eggplant. From someone who takes editing plants seriously, 🌿MtBotany (talk) 21:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Ha ha. Thanks for the laugh, truly, I needed it. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

An egg roll for you!

The Egg Roll Award
Anyone who goes through the RfA process, which is unmistakably a grueling one--much less two times over--is a hero in my book. Having attained a 2/3rds majority is huge and I have the utmost confidence that you will get the mop at some point :)

You already improved after the first election and I anticipate that you will do even better the next time with the current feedback from the 'crats & the 'Oppose' camp. We can't please everyone, but know that you will always remain a talented and valued editor, mop or not. WP is lucky to have you. That Coptic Guyping me! (talk) (contribs) 19:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for this. I can pretty much see where Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/EggRoll97 2/Bureaucrat chat is going, so I appreciate this. EggRoll97 (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
My condolences as well. RFA is a rough way to spend a week, even if you end up mostly unopposed. You appear to have done really well under the pressure, honestly, so I hope you take that as something of a badge of honour. If in the future you decide you're masochistic enough to take a third run at it, please do get nominators - it makes the whole thing so much easier. -- asilvering (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. It was at least nice to know that I was supported by so many people. EggRoll97 (talk) 22:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
You ARE supported by so many people (not past tense). You'd need to misbehave to lose my support, but I don't see that happening. No, if you take the feedback you DID get and incorporate much of it into your daily process, then you may run when you think you're ready. Get at least one nominator who is well-respected. For me it was eleven years, but for you it would be a much, much shorter time period, IMHO. I think the community is very much interested in your debrief, which I encourage when the heat has died down. BusterD (talk) 22:24, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Seconding about the debrief. If you'll take advice, EggRoll, I'd suggest writing down a bunch of notes about how you feel about this asap and then burying those notes somewhere for a while. You've had a lot more distance from the elections than you have from the RFA right now, and it would probably be more helpful to future admin hopefuls to read what you think about the processes when they're both somewhat distant. -- asilvering (talk) 22:59, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll write some down at the moment, and probably take a look back at it in a few weeks to a month or so and make sure it still looks like an accurate reflection. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Your request for adminship

Hi EggRoll97, unfortunately, the verdict of the bureaucrat chat about your request for adminship is that consensus does not exist at this time to make you an administrator.

But, on the bright side, you have shifted community opinion in your favor, and heavily, since your admin election result and you have been given plenty of positive feedback for how to improve. Many of those in opposition would like to support, and will happily do so should you make a third attempt with those issues addressed.

So well done for the improved performance. Keep on editing, keep up hope and try again when you're ready. Acalamari 22:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, Acalamari. This is a really minor thing, but I just wanted to check, should the result be listed as "unsuccessful" or "no consensus"? Based on prior RFAs ending unsuccessfully after a crat chat (example: Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/MB), I would assume no consensus, but I don't know if you were intentionally using "unsuccessful" instead. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Nevermind, looks like GTrang just fixed it. EggRoll97 (talk) 01:44, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Yes, "no consensus" is correct. The answer is that while updating the page, I copied and pasted the existing unsuccessful RfA line and edited that, but forgot to change the terminology to suit yours. So that was my error, nothing more. Acalamari 09:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-17

MediaWiki message delivery 20:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-18

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

As always, Wikimedia community governance relies on user participation; plus, more updates from the Wikimedia world
Scrapers, an Indian lawsuit, and a crash-or-not-crash?
And other new research findings.
And don't bite those newbies!
And don't bite those newbies!
Television dramas, televised sports, film, the Pope, and ... bioengineering at the top of the list?
Community volunteers network among themselves and use technology to counter attacks on information sharing.
A look at some product and tech highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation's Annual Plan (July–December 2024).
Hey! At least it is something!
Zounds!
Would a billion articles be a good idea?
There's a lot more to this than you think.
I wonder about having crats, but decided to become one anyway.
Just beautiful photos!
Rest in Paradise.

Tech News: 2025-19

MediaWiki message delivery 00:11, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey there, I noticed that you closed my RM for the 2016-2017 SAG-AFTRA strike, and I have some concerns about the nature of your closing.

Firstly, the other editor (@IgelRM) you mentioned did not outright oppose my RM, and instead just raised concerns about the usage of "SAG-AFTRA" in the title. I responded with my reasoning, and they unfortunately did not reply. However, in your closing note, you assumed (or at the very least, implied) that IgelRM used WP:COMMONNAME in their reply, and as such used it as justification for not moving (or, in other words, a left-field WP:SUPERVOTE).

Secondly, you closed the RM as "not moved", instead of "no consensus". There was not a consensus to keep it as the current title, and a "not moved" close will dissuade others from trying to move it in the future.

I ask you to reverse your closure, or I will seek more opinions at WP:MR. Thank you for your consideration. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:21, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

@Jeffrey34555: I meant to click no consensus, thanks for letting me know. Whether IgelRM has stated their intention to outright oppose the RM is irrelevant, as RMs are not votes, but consensus discussions, and IgelRM's argument against usage of SAG-AFTRA in the title applies to both suggested titles in the RM. It is not a supervote to state that an argument is consistent with the principles of WP:COMMONNAME, nor did I imply anything close to their usage of the policy itself, simply that their argument is in line with policy. If you somehow have come to the conclusion that there is consensus to move the page, feel free to open an MR, but I will not be reversing the closure at this time. EggRoll97 (talk) 04:27, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. While I still disagree with your reasoning, I've decided against taking it to WP:MR, as I'm currently busy in the real world and don't want to use up time debating something that probably wouldn't matter to me in a few weeks. However, I do appreciate you for moving it to "no consensus", thank you for that. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 04:50, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-20

MediaWiki message delivery 22:35, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

And comment is requested on a privacy whitepaper.
And other courtroom drama.
And how he knows it: all about lawyer letters and editing logs.
Why the language barrier is not the only impediment to navigating sources from another culture.
And QR codes for every page!
When an editor is ready to become staff at a public library (not a brother in a fraternity).
Rest in peace.
The technology behind it, and the other stuff.
Gadzooks!
And more.

Tech News: 2025-21

MediaWiki message delivery 23:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello EggRoll97:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in June!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 1 month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 June 2025 through 30 June 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3200 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Looks like a new user copied your user page

User:YouTubeFans2002. The account was created a few weeks ago, but the user recently filled the user page with barnstars which say "This award is given to EggRoll97". Strange. — Chrisahn (talk) 18:54, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure is interesting behavior. Thanks for letting me know. EggRoll97 (talk) 19:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-22

MediaWiki message delivery 20:02, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-23

MediaWiki message delivery 23:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar
Thank you so much for your work on Edit Filters. Really appreciate it! Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 23:35, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Much appreciated, thanks! EggRoll97 (talk) 00:42, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Have you ever

set aside your feelings and done something very different from what you feel like doing? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Deepfriedokra, I have, many times throughout my life. I'm not sure what specifically you mean by this. EggRoll97 (talk) 09:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Seen and responded to, Deepfriedokra. EggRoll97 (talk) 09:16, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Excellent. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:23, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-24

MediaWiki message delivery 01:14, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-25

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

EFM

Hi EggRoll,

You're currently the most active non-admin EFM on enwiki right now, so I would just like to get your opinion on me running for EFM maybe one to two weeks from now. I've worked on quite a few filters both private and public in the last three months since my request for EFH was accepted in early april, including 1161 (will not discuss this in public), 1296/1297 (fix weather-related FPs), 869 (add tasnim news), 1163 (fix math tag FPs, which you just implemented), and 547 (will not discuss this either in public).

Thanks – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 00:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

@PharyngealImplosive7, I think you're fairly well qualified for it. I will note it's only been ~2 months or so since you applied for EFH, which isn't necessarily a deal-breaker for me, though in your EFH request I see I would like to caution you about prematurely applying for EFM as it is a much more selectively granted right. Something else raised in your EFH request is that you have a significant portion of your edits overall in Wikipedia to the EFFPR page, which again, isn't a deal-breaker for me, though may be for others. For example, mine is at 15%, while the rest of my edits lay in other areas of the wiki. EggRoll97 (talk) 02:20, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. It has been noted. PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-26

MediaWiki message delivery 23:18, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

Admins arrested in Belarus.
Pardon our alliteration!
A get-out-of-jail card!
And other new research publications.
Holy men and not-as-holy movies.
Get your self-nomination in by July 2nd!
After two years RuWiki fails to thrive.
With some sweet-and-sour sauce!
Every thing you need to know about the Wikimedia Foundation?
Egad!

New message from 1F616EMO

Hello, EggRoll97. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-06-24/Debriefing.
Message added 12:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1F616EMO (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-27

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-28

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • July 9–15 - Call for candidates
  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-29

MediaWiki message delivery 20:06, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

Endowment tax form, Wikimania, elections, U4C, fundraising and a duck!
And how do we know?
Five-year journey comes to healthy fruition.
Wikimedians from around the world will gather in person and online at the twentieth annual meeting of Wikimania.
As well as "hermeneutic excursions" and other scientific research findings.
The report covers the Foundation's operations from July 2023 - June 2024
A step towards objective and comprehensive coverage of a project nearly too big to follow.
Drawn this century!
How data from the Wikipedia "necessary articles" lists can shed new light on the gender gap
Annual plans, external trends, infrastructure, equity, safety, and effectiveness. What does it all mean?
Rest in peace.
Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
If you are too blasé for Mr. Blasé and don't give a FAC.

Tech News: 2025-30

MediaWiki message delivery 23:38, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started and continues until July 29 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 23–29 – Voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 – Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for approximately four days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello

Please join doscussion on talk page of Male Genital Examination 2A02:C7C:746D:3000:A870:2E3C:B18B:5BCD (talk) 16:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

I decline. Your edits are puerile vandalism, and wishing you could touch someone's pen*s is not an appropriate edit. EggRoll97 (talk) 16:27, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the July 2025 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • July 18–22 - Discussion phase (we are here)
  • July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • July 30–c. Aug 3 - Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Discussion phase.

On July 23, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's totals during the election. You must be extended confirmed to vote.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last approximately four days, or perhaps a little longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (you may want to watchlist this page) and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and must also have received a minimum of 20 support votes. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-31

MediaWiki message delivery 00:23, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-32

MediaWiki message delivery 03:36, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

Plus a mysterious CheckUser incident, and the news with Wikinews.
A review of June, July and August.
Who is this guy?
Threads since June.
And slop.
It's not a conlang, it's a crossword puzzle.
gang aft agley, an' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain, for promis'd joy!
Everybody's Somebody's Fool.

Tech News: 2025-33

MediaWiki message delivery 23:25, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-34

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-35

MediaWiki message delivery 00:08, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-36

MediaWiki message delivery 20:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

UK Online Safety Act remains undefeated.
Plus Wiki rules, Wiki Spin, and physicists get street cred!
The price of Liberty is eternal vigilance.
And other new research findings.
Tis true: there's magic in the web of it.
With the usual mix of war, death, super heroes, a belt, and Wednesday.
It's an easy one.

Tech News: 2025-37

MediaWiki message delivery 01:10, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | RFC phase

The RFC phase of the July 2025 administrator elections has started. There are 10 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/RFCs.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-38

MediaWiki message delivery 17:02, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-39

MediaWiki message delivery 22:51, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-40

MediaWiki message delivery 20:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

This time "not merely negative".
Wickedpedia wrangles post-truth politics.
Unexpected news!
Fifty hot topics from fourteen noticeboards.
Policy, politics, icons, captchas, and LLMs.
And other recent publications.
When to walk away.
Rest in peace.
Celebrities, deaths and software.
All invited!

Tech News: 2025-41

MediaWiki message delivery 17:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-42

MediaWiki message delivery 18:55, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Antoine Garnier

Information icon Hello, EggRoll97. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Antoine Garnier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-43

MediaWiki message delivery 19:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

And the "Global Resource Distribution Committee" emerges.
Two shortlisted WMF Board candidates removed from the ballot.
Who was bumped and why?
...while Musk prepares to launch "Grokipedia".
Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.
Don't get too excited before you read this.

Your Nostalgia Wikipedia imports

Hello, thanks for your efforts to import edits from the Nostalgia Wikipedia. Importing edits from there is complicated and has only gotten more so over time due to software changes; see my user subpage about it, User:Graham87/Import, but as it happens I only added a note about how out-of-date it was in March 2025, after you received transwiki import rights. Unfortunately Nostalgia Wikipedia imports almost always require importupload permissions these days to do them with usernames/edit histories properly intact; they can only be done properly with transwiki importing if (a) the edit you want to import is the top edit in the Nostalgia Wikipedia history and (b) it was made by either an IP editor or an editor with a username that contains an underline, an initial lowercase letter, or consecutive spaces (i.e. it is affected by T2323). In the case of my second point, to get the usernames transferred over correctly, you need to check the box that says " Assign edits to local users where the named user exists locally". As for your imports themselves, several of them were relatively tangential due to deletions in 2002. Not all the Nostalgia Wikipedia's page history absolutely *has* to be here; some of it only belongs there. re the ones about countries, there are probably about a thousand of those and they're all based on the public domain work The World Factbook. I see that you probably looked through Wikipedia:Usemod article histories to find some of your pages to import; I myself had worked through this list several years ago to see what needed importing, but I'd missed User:Ed_Poor/Learning, so thanks for trying to deal with that one. I actually found your Nostalgia Wikipedia imports while looking at the history of that page, while checking for edits made by Conversion script from January 2005, because they can now be dealt with much more easily after the features mentioned in T382958 made it to this site. See this permalink to my logs related to your imports for my commentary on them. If you see something that you think needs to be imported from the Nostalgia Wikipedia, feel free to either flag it at Wikipedia:Requests for page importation, where I can check it out, or message me directly. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Will do. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Your Nostalgia Wikipedia imports

Hello, thanks for your efforts to import edits from the Nostalgia Wikipedia. Importing edits from there is complicated and has only gotten more so over time due to software changes; see my user subpage about it, User:Graham87/Import, but as it happens I only added a note about how out-of-date it was in March 2025, after you received transwiki import rights. Unfortunately Nostalgia Wikipedia imports almost always require importupload permissions these days to do them with usernames/edit histories properly intact; they can only be done properly with transwiki importing if (a) the edit you want to import is the top edit in the Nostalgia Wikipedia history and (b) it was made by either an IP editor or an editor with a username that contains an underline, an initial lowercase letter, or consecutive spaces (i.e. it is affected by T2323). In the case of my second point, to get the usernames transferred over correctly, you need to check the box that says " Assign edits to local users where the named user exists locally". As for your imports themselves, several of them were relatively tangential due to deletions in 2002. Not all the Nostalgia Wikipedia's page history absolutely *has* to be here; some of it only belongs there. re the ones about countries, there are probably about a thousand of those and they're all based on the public domain work The World Factbook. I see that you probably looked through Wikipedia:Usemod article histories to find some of your pages to import; I myself had worked through this list several years ago to see what needed importing, but I'd missed User:Ed_Poor/Learning, so thanks for trying to deal with that one. I actually found your Nostalgia Wikipedia imports while looking at the history of that page, while checking for edits made by Conversion script from January 2005, because they can now be dealt with much more easily after the features mentioned in T382958 made it to this site. See this permalink to my logs related to your imports for my commentary on them. If you see something that you think needs to be imported from the Nostalgia Wikipedia, feel free to either flag it at Wikipedia:Requests for page importation, where I can check it out, or message me directly. Thanks! Graham87 (talk) 17:50, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Will do. EggRoll97 (talk) 03:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-44

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to the clerk team!

Hi EggRoll97. We have added you to the list of clerks and subscribed you to the mailing list (info: WP:AC/C#clerks-l). Welcome, and I look forward to working with you! To adjust your subscription options for the mailing list, see the link at mail:clerks-l. The mailing list works in the usual way, and the address to which new mailing list threads can be sent is clerks-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Useful reading for new clerks is the procedures page, WP:AC/CP, but you will learn all the basic components of clerking on-the-job.

New clerks begin as a trainee, are listed as such at WP:AC/C#Personnel, and will remain so until they have learned all the aspects of the job. When you've finished training, which usually takes a few months (and a maximum of one year), then we'll propose to the Committee that you be made a full clerk. As a clerk, you'll need to check your e-mail regularly, as the mailing list is where the clerks co-ordinate (a on-wiki clerks' noticeboard also exists but is not used nearly as much). If you've any questions at any point of your traineeship, simply post to the mailing list.

Lastly, it might be useful if you enter your timezone into WP:AC/C#Personnel (in the same format as the other members have), so that we can estimate when we will have clerks available each day; this is, of course, at your discretion. Again, welcome! Regards, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, EggRoll97. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 22:08, 31 October 2025 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Codename Noreste (discusscontribs) 22:08, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Replied via email. EggRoll97 (talk) 22:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
I replied back to you. Codename Noreste (discusscontribs) 23:11, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
 Done EggRoll97 (talk) 23:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-45

MediaWiki message delivery 19:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)