Jump to content

User talk:CGSize

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CGSize, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi CGSize! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Knoxville SC (October 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SL93 (talk) 00:37, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Knoxville SC (November 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Need more than local coverage.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 22:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One Knoxville SC submission declined

[edit]

User S0091,

Hi, thank you for your speedy response to my article submission. I saw your comment that I needed more than local coverage. I have included a reference directly from the United Soccer League Two website, which is not a local affiliate and is a reputable, reliable secondary source that is independent of the subject. Additionally, although the sources I have included are local, they are published, independent, and not affiliated in any manner with the club. The club was founded earlier this year, there simply is not a large circulation of coverage to draw from other than local news. See Wikipedia article "Vermont Green FC". Vermont Green is another expansion team joining USL League Two in 2022. Vermont's article was approved with a similar number of references and local coverage.

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Knoxville SC (November 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mikehawk10 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:AUD and WP:ORGIND. There needs to be interest from more than just the local area, the content itself in the coverage must be independent, and this club does not inherit notability from being in a sports league.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Knoxville SC (January 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
WP:TOOSOON. They will likely become notable once season starts
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 04:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:One Knoxville SC has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:One Knoxville SC. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 03:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Knoxville SC (May 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dege31 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Too soon
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dege31 (talk) 11:27, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]