User talk:Akashmaan18

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Saffron (color), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 19:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How come it's not constructive when a false claim is being corrected with a factual statement with references and proof ? Akashmaan18 (talk) 19:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saffron (color). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Ashley yoursmile! 19:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you are from BJP's IT wing pushing the political agenda ! Otherwise there's no sensible reason to undermine another religion! Again, how does an edit supported with references is wrong while an edit that's been marked with "citation needed" is accurate ? Akashmaan18 (talk) 19:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Saffron (color). Ashley yoursmile! 20:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm been wasting my money all these years donating to Wikimedia foundation thinking it was a knowledge base ? When it has actually become a political conspirator in reality ? Go ahead, get me blocked ! Akashmaan18 (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First edits

So there's been something of a misunderstanding here and I'd like to clear it up so that you don't come away with the wrong impression of our editors and might consider participating further. After seeing your messages here I went back and took a second look at your changes, and now I see what content you were trying to replace, which would not have been a bad change on its own. However, your edits also broke some templates and added URLs and </ref> tags in random places. That, combined with no edit summary to let us know what you were trying to accomplish, led me and other editors to believe you were vandalizing the page. I will admit that I probably didn't take enough time in looking through the whole edit, but when patrolling for vandalism it's easy to see some bad things and not even scroll down to look at the rest. For your part, in the future if one of your edits is reverted please step back and take a look at the actual differences and the resulting effect on the page rather than just immediately restoring the change. I can assure you that nothing here was politically motivated. I don't even have a clue about the political conflicts that you're referring to. And if you take a look at the page now, it's in the process of being further modified to more accurately talk about the Nishan Sahib. Anyway, I hope you might be willing to try editing in the future, and here's some links that might help you do that:

Also feel free to message me on my talk page with questions. -- Fyrael (talk) 21:14, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]