User talk:2406:8800:81:CCF1:3083:A050:474D:30AE
Frequent disruptive editing
[edit]This memo is to notify you that frequent disruptive editing and reversion without valid reason will lead to the blockage of your IP address. Use my talk page before making changes.Next disruptive edit will be notified to the administrators. LordStalin (talk) 12:54, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Slatersteven (talk) 11:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
[edit]
Your editing history at Unnaipol Oruvan (2009 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. That means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Instead of reverting edits, please stop editing the page and discuss on the talk page to create a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a Third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you break the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if it looks like you intend to continue reverting. —Fortuna, imperatrix 11:58, 23 October 2025 (UTC)