User:RaeMer/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?

I chose it because it was about a building that sort of interested me. My first impression of the that it was a short article and it could use some more details and images.

Evaluate the article

Lead Section

Yes, the Kingston City Library in Kingston, NY.
It only has two sections: building and history. Yes, it briefly talks about them.
No, it doesn't.
It's concise and to the point.

Content

What little is written, seems relevant.
The most recent article was from 2011, so not super up-to-date.
In the building section it doesn't talk about the inspirations of the building, who designed it, or what the floor plan is like. Those could be added in this section.
No equity gaps and no misrepresentation.

Tone and Balance

It's neutral.
No biases.
No misrepresentations.
No viewpoints undescribed.
No persuasion.

Sources and References

Everything is backed up by another source.
One of the sources is available literature.
Most current is 2011.
Half are from the same person and the other half are all different authors.
Yes, there is always other information available.
Half of the sources used no longer can be found/the page no longer exists.

Organization and Writing Quality

It's clear, concise, and easy to read.
No grammar errors I could see.
It's well organized by topic. It could use some paragraph restructuring though.

Images and Media

N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Talk Page Discussion

N/A
It's rated Class-C and apart of 4 WikiProjects.
N/A

Overall Impressions

Class-C? The article could use some work in all aspects, some needing more work than others.
The strength is it's well organized.
The article could use more information about the building as a whole. The possible inspirations, any historical events that took place there, anything new since 2011 (when it was last touched), and maybe some more pictures.
The article is underdeveloped, it could use quite a bit more information.