User contributions for GRvGloschau
Results for GRvGloschau talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 33 edits. Account created on 6 August 2018.
15 August 2018
- 19:0619:06, 15 August 2018 diff hist +337 Eats, Shoots & Leaves →Criticism: Commentary on the commentary from Truss herself
- 18:5818:58, 15 August 2018 diff hist +26 m Lynne Truss →Non-fiction: wikilink
10 August 2018
- 20:1420:14, 10 August 2018 diff hist +43 User talk:GRvGloschau No edit summary current
- 20:0920:09, 10 August 2018 diff hist +141 Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) →Requested move 6 August 2018: roger roger
- 18:2118:21, 10 August 2018 diff hist +877 Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) Please advise
- 18:1718:17, 10 August 2018 diff hist +346 Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) →Requested move 6 August 2018: lol
8 August 2018
- 19:2919:29, 8 August 2018 diff hist +272 Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) →Requested move 6 August 2018
- 19:2619:26, 8 August 2018 diff hist +33 Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) →Requested move 6 August 2018: I didn't realize this was an option
- 19:2519:25, 8 August 2018 diff hist +585 Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) →Names and explosions
- 19:1719:17, 8 August 2018 diff hist −34 Imperial–royal Development of the real union began in the late middle ages and was finalized during the reign of Joseph II. The Compromise was centrifugal with respect to Transleithania, not centripetal with respect to the other half.
7 August 2018
- 19:3619:36, 7 August 2018 diff hist +2 m Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) →Names and explosions: grammar
- 19:3119:31, 7 August 2018 diff hist +1,668 Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) →Names and explosions: new section
- 19:3019:30, 7 August 2018 diff hist −172 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) Please see talk
- 19:2919:29, 7 August 2018 diff hist −67 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) Nothing unexplained about this. Read the edit summary. Tag: Undo
- 19:2919:29, 7 August 2018 diff hist +20 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) "Citation for what?" Citation for the dubious claim made in the sentence that precedes the CN tag. Check my original edit summary. Please do not remove the tag a 3rd time without addressing it first.
- 19:2719:27, 7 August 2018 diff hist −395 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) "Doesn't require citations?" Grand pronouncements that look more like editorializing than scholarship always require citations. If there are citations in other articles, like you say there are, find them and add them here. Tag: Undo
- 18:5718:57, 7 August 2018 diff hist +46 A Woman of No Importance →Act III: The audience has to infer the assault for the time being. Illingworth did try to kiss her, but this is not expressly spelled out until late into the 4th act.
- 18:5218:52, 7 August 2018 diff hist +78 A Woman of No Importance →Act I: Out of sequence. The letter arrives before Illingworth and Allonby return. Illingworth is not "aghast" so much as indifferent, at least outwardly.
- 18:4818:48, 7 August 2018 diff hist +139 A Woman of No Importance →Act I: "You think there is not a woman in the world who would object to being kissed? Miss Worsley would not let you kiss her."
- 18:4518:45, 7 August 2018 diff hist +20 A Woman of No Importance →Act I: It's not that Illingworth thinks he's irresistible, it's that he can't accept no means no: "I don't think there is a woman in the world who would not be a little flattered if one made love to her."
- 18:3318:33, 7 August 2018 diff hist +35 N User:GRvGloschau Maybe later current Tag: New redirect
6 August 2018
- 19:5719:57, 6 August 2018 diff hist −450 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) Your own previous addition to King-Emperor treats the terms as synonymous. Is there any source for either your old or your new story? If it's not original research there must surely be a source. Also please do not remove the CN tag again, it's against conventions.
- 19:3419:34, 6 August 2018 diff hist +15 m The Handmaid's Tale (TV series) →Season 1 (2017): It's only one guard, and he only threatens Offred. This happens after Offred drops her stone but before the others drop theirs.
- 19:2319:23, 6 August 2018 diff hist +20 King-emperor Never seen the in print in English. No crowns were "merged" in the case of Austria-Hungary.
- 19:2019:20, 6 August 2018 diff hist +446 Talk:Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) No edit summary
- 19:1319:13, 6 August 2018 diff hist −395 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) Smacks of original research. "Best known"? What about the British monarchs who were Emperors of India?
- 19:1119:11, 6 August 2018 diff hist −172 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) Ceisleithania and Transleithania both exploded into multiple pieces. Hungary only was a republic nominally and only for a few months.
- 19:0919:09, 6 August 2018 diff hist −31 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) He didn't resign, Hungary deposed him
- 19:0819:08, 6 August 2018 diff hist −55 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) It wasn't really merely "dual" since Cisleithania was never just a single kingdom, and saying that FJ "established" it implies he did it voluntarily
- 19:0619:06, 6 August 2018 diff hist −12 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) The Lands of the Crown of Saint Stephen consisted of more than just the Kingdom of Hungary
- 19:0419:04, 6 August 2018 diff hist −11 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) "Austrian Empire" was the common name for the whole thing, not just for the Cisleithanian half proper
- 19:0219:02, 6 August 2018 diff hist −43 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) Oversimplification. Constitutional monarchy wasn't fully established in the Austrian half until later.
- 18:5818:58, 6 August 2018 diff hist +19 Emperor-King (Austria-Hungary) I'm aware of k.k./k.u.k. but I've never seen "Emperor-King" in print in English
