User contributions for Ermenrich

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

16:5816:58, 2 November 2025 diff hist +21 Nahuatl the Uto-Aztecan absolutive ending means that a noun is not possessed - it has nothing to do with the absolutive case current
16:3216:32, 2 November 2025 diff hist +697 Talk:Weser–Rhine Germanic →Separating linguistics and archaeology: Reply current Tag: Reply
14:4214:42, 2 November 2025 diff hist −13 Talk:Weser–Rhine Germanic →"Wesser-Rhine Germanic" and "Frankish" being two separate articles is redundant: tweak - it does discuss all the different forms, both in and out of OHG
14:3914:39, 2 November 2025 diff hist +657 Talk:Weser–Rhine Germanic →"Wesser-Rhine Germanic" and "Frankish" being two separate articles is redundant: Reply Tag: Reply
14:1214:12, 2 November 2025 diff hist −231 Weser–Rhine Germanic →Sources: this book discusses the groups mostly in terms of ethnic unities - it's original publication date (1992) and its status as a basic introductory textbook mean that it's probably not a good source for this article current
14:1014:10, 2 November 2025 diff hist +7 m Talk:Weser–Rhine Germanic →Separating linguistics and archaeology: fix indent
14:1014:10, 2 November 2025 diff hist +2,473 Talk:Weser–Rhine Germanic →Separating linguistics and archaeology: Reply Tag: Reply
13:5713:57, 2 November 2025 diff hist −209 Weser–Rhine Germanic →Theory: Robinson says nothing of the sort
02:5402:54, 2 November 2025 diff hist +336 Talk:Weser–Rhine Germanic →Separating linguistics and archaeology: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply

18:4518:45, 1 November 2025 diff hist +227 Talk:Weser–Rhine Germanic →"Wesser-Rhine Germanic" and "Frankish" being two separate articles is redundant: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
13:4013:40, 1 November 2025 diff hist +257 Talk:Weser–Rhine Germanic →Separating linguistics and archaeology: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
13:3513:35, 1 November 2025 diff hist +120 Talk:Hunnic language →KIMIZ: Add current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
13:3313:33, 1 November 2025 diff hist +252 Talk:Vikings →embrio of russia: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
13:3013:30, 1 November 2025 diff hist +169 Talk:Hunnic language →KIMIZ: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply

19:1219:12, 31 October 2025 diff hist +259 Talk:Ostrogoths →Supposed use of AI: Reply Tag: Reply
15:4815:48, 31 October 2025 diff hist +251 Talk:Ostrogoths →Supposed use of AI: Reply Tag: Reply
15:4715:47, 31 October 2025 diff hist +953 Ostrogoths per talk page discussion - the information appears accurate and is appropriate for the article. While I and others have expressed doubts about whether this is AI (and the OP has denied it), even if it is, there is no Wikipedia policy against the use of AI-generated text, see WP:AI Tag: Undo
12:2312:23, 31 October 2025 diff hist +33 Pannonian Avars We don’t know that and sources speculate on it current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
12:2212:22, 31 October 2025 diff hist +32 Hunnic language The comparison is in the source cited current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit