Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJAX Framework
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:54, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- CJAX Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this framework have enough notability, the article can not show that at least. –ebraminiotalk 12:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no indication of notability. In fact the combination of (1) wrong name (should be CJAX) and (2) unintelligible yet promotional text makes this article doomed: no good content to move. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: sources do not meet WP:RS. The article is all over the place structurally. MountainMan11 (talk) 20:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 19:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Seems not notable due to lack of sources. Given the topic, unlikely ever to meet the significance requirements of WP:NSOFT. -- BenTels (talk) 00:42, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.