Jump to content

Talk:Training to failure

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Current research may contradict article

This page is really poorly supported by research. For example https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26666744 states the complete opposite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.57.104.135 (talk) 11:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is poorly sourced, and would benefit from the academic research findings found here, here and here. 14.2.198.139 (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the paper you're citing: has an issued correction: In it, the authors rewrite some statements to indicate there was no significant difference between failure and non-failure training. For example, in the abstract:

"Non-failure training resulted in a 0.6–1.3% greater strength increase than failure training." (original)

"No significant strength increases were found for failure training versus non-failure training (ES = 0.05, p = 0.73)" (corrected)

That being said, I do agree the article could use with some more studies and clearer language. Cheers — Avelludo (Talk / Contribs / Log) 03:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mtpride07 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Mtpride07 (talk) 23:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]