Talk:Julia (programming language)/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Julia (programming language). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Moving "Notable uses" subsection to a new "Adoption" section?
I wanted to get some input on this before I actually did this since it would be a rather large edit. I noticed that the Notable uses section is rather large and may warrant its own section. Using Rust (programming language) as a guide, I think it would be best if this subsection were to be moved to a section talking about its adoption. Moreover, I think the History section should focus on the language's history and development, not the companies that use it.
Let me know your thoughts on this potential restructuring! :) Moon motif (talk) 09:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hey just a note that I decided to go with the change after no input over a week. I also removed some parts that either did not have good sources or I felt did not fit "large companies/governments adopting Julia for their work." Also to note: while I was restructuring, I noticed that many of the sources in this section may not be the most reliable? I kept them in for now but it might be best if the source for some of these claims is not a Julia package's Github README, for example. Especially when there could be better sources to back the information. That's all I wanted to say hope you have a wonderful weekend if you're reading this :) Moon motif (talk) 10:24, 30 October 2022 (UTC)