Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative versions of Gambit

Alternative versions of Gambit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same as the currently five active AfDs on the topic, fails WP:NOTPLOT. This is not justified as a spinout when summary style writing can easily condense it into the most important points. There is no benefit to merging the existing content due to lack of real world information from third party sources. TTN (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge a basic summary to Gambit (comics). BOZ (talk) 23:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge referenced parts of a summary to Gambit, if not already there. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There were a lot of [volume & issue needed], but I've added those sources to the page.108.208.137.15 (talk) 19:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I really fail to see why that page should be deleted, it's no different than a dozen other pages like it.[1]-HARDACAndroid (talk) 19:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]