Jump to content

Talk:Carlsbad Programme/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aircorn (talk | contribs) at 07:28, 1 December 2019 (GA Review: pings). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CPA-5 (talk · contribs) 13:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


  • Is the official name of the event really in German? If not then translate it.
  • The Karlsbader Programm (German: Karlsbader Programm, Czech: Karlovy Vary program) Unlink German.
  • of the first Czechoslovak Republic on April 24th, 1938 in Karlsbad (Modern-day Karlovy Vary) In Europe we use DD/MM/YYYY the only nations who use MM/DD/YYYY are the US, Canada and sometimes Israel too.
  • Following pressure from Nazi Germany, Britain and France during Unlink both France and Britain because of common terms.
  • the territory of the modern-day Czech Republic and Slovakia Little bit vague here. I thought that Czechoslovakia also parts of lands had in modern-day Ukraine?
  • included the predominantly German-speaking Sudetenland Unlink German because of common term.
  • We have here two "however"s in a short article like this. Maybe remove the second, however.
  • The Sudeten Germans didn't want to belong to a Czechoslovak --> "The Sudeten Germans did not want to belong to a Czechoslovak"
  • they were used to being part of the Austrian monarchy Link the Austrian monarchy.
  • and they didn't suddenly want to be a minority in a state --> "and they did not suddenly want to be a minority in a state"
  • "Sudeten Germans" is overlinked.
  • be citizens of Czechoslovakia Unlink Czechoslovakia because it looks like an overlink.
  • "Sudetenland" is overlinked.
  • Sudeten German National Socialist Party v. Sudeten German Party standardise their usage.
  • Third Reich in March 1938, Hitler made himself --> "Third Reich in March 1938, Adolf Hitler made himself"
  • On the 24th April 1938, at an SdP party congress --> "On 24 April 1938, at an SdP party congress" We do not use ordinals in dates.
  • party congress on the 24th April 1938 in the city Same as above.
  • Czechoslovakia, to begin not later than the 1st of October --> "Czechoslovakia, to begin not later than 1 October"
  • part of army maneuvers.[11][12] On the 4th or 5th of September --> "part of army maneuvers.[11][12] On 4 or 5 September"
  • the Sudeten Germans weren't intent on conciliation --> "the Sudeten Germans were not intent on conciliation"
  • On the 12th September, Hitler made a speech --> "On 12 September, Hitler made a speech"
  • On the 13th September, after internal violence --> "On 13 September, after internal violence"
  • in Berchtesgaden on the 15th September and agreed --> "in Berchtesgaden on 15 September and agreed"
  • and on the 21st September, Czechoslovakia capitulated --> "and on 21 September, Czechoslovakia capitulated"
  • On the 28th September, Hitler met with the --> "On 28 September, Hitler met with the"
  • On the 29th September, the Munich Agreement was signed by Germany, Italy Pipe Italy and we do not use ordinals in dates.

Infobox

  • There's none.

Images

  • File:Konrad Henlein v Karlových Varech 1937.jpg How do we know it is copy-right free? I mean we do not know who was the author and when he died. Maybe he died in the 60s? Could you also give the image a link to the image?
  • The rest looks good to me.

Sources

  • Add a |language=German in the first ref
  • Ref 2 is the same as ref 1.
  • Split the "References" section in two and add all the books in the "bibliography" section. Add also page numbers in the "References" as the article's citation.
  • Michael's ISBN should be linked.
  • Ref 4 is a dead link. And it hasn't an access-date, date, or a title.
  • Ref 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15, 17 and 18 do not have a link or a book code. This is a major issue.
  • Some ISBNs have hyphens and others don't maybe standardise them.

That's it for now. The sources are a major issue here if these comments are addressed then I'll have another review whether the sources are good placed and reliable or not. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@KhakePakeVatan and CPA-5: How are we going with this? AIRcorn (talk) 07:28, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]